Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

Sean Whitton: > Okay, how can I tell that this server is down using this new system? i created another status file, "status_sql". (it's actually a symlink to the server currently holding user databases). - river. pgpF52WkHVbmQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

Okay, how can I tell that this server is down using this new system? Sean On 05/09/07, River Tarnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sean Whitton: > > Could someone kindly remind me which box user databases are on (1, 2 or > > 3?)? > > user databases are on "sql". you shouldn't rely on them being o

Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

Sometimes, I didn't know on which server I work, because I use as mysql-host: $lang."wiki"."-p.db.ts.wikimedia.org" I'm happy about this solution. These are multilingual script and I don't want to think about on which server the special language is. I don't think that it is really neccesary to c

Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

Sean Whitton: > Could someone kindly remind me which box user databases are on (1, 2 or > 3?)? user databases are on "sql". you shouldn't rely on them being on a particular cluster, since they might move to another one (after zedler crashed, i moved user dbs from zedler to vandale). -

Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

On 9/5/07, Sean Whitton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Could someone kindly remind me which box user databases are on (1, 2 or 3?)? > s2. However currently both s1 and s2 point to the same server. Bryan ___ Toolserver-l mailing list Toolserver

Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

Hello, Could someone kindly remind me which box user databases are on (1, 2 or 3?)? Thanks, Sean On 05/09/07, Byrial Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DaB. wrote: > > To inform our tool-user better in future, I created some files: > > > > http://tools.wikimedia.de/status_s1 (same for s2 and s

Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

DaB. wrote: > To inform our tool-user better in future, I created some files: > > http://tools.wikimedia.de/status_s1 (same for s2 and s3). That accounts for connections to sql-s1, sql-s2 and sql-s3. What about connections to sql to access the toolserver database? Shouldn't there be a status fil

Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files > > DaB.: > > You should read the file and parse the first line, that not beginns with > > "#". > > Then your tool knows, what's the status of cluster is. Is it "OK"

Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

DaB.: > You should read the file and parse the first line, that not beginns with "#". > Then your tool knows, what's the status of cluster is. Is it "OK", you have > to do nothing more, if it's "INFO" and "WARN", it's your decison if you > display something. Is it "ERRO" or "DOWN" you must ("mus

Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

Hello, Am Montag 03 September 2007 23:01 schrieb Sean Whitton: > Hello, > > To confirm, are you suggesting we edit our scripts to read this file > and put in "sorry, server is down" if that is the case? You should read the file and parse the first line, that not beginns with "#". Then your tool k

Re: [Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

Hello, To confirm, are you suggesting we edit our scripts to read this file and put in "sorry, server is down" if that is the case? This only applies to tools using sql too, right? I am personally against an enforcable rule (but would definately follow it if imposed). Thanks, Sean On 03/09/07

[Toolserver-l] SQL-S2 down and new status-files

Hello all, perhaps anybody (someone?) didn't notice it: The msql-db on zedler (=S2 and userdatabases) crashed. The restore is in progress, please wait a bit. We get many questions from tool-user "The tool xyz does not work" or "Why is the toolserver defect/crashed/explode?". To inform our tool