Re: Topband: Pseudo Inverted L & Radial Field

2011-10-26 Thread Eddy Swynar
On 2011-10-25, at 8:57 PM, Steven Raas wrote: > 1) Would adding a a pair of 130' radials that are bent (running TO property > edge and then along property edge) give me any real world performance > difference? Would I have to add say 4 , 8 or 16 of these to make it worth > while in ADDITION to th

Re: Topband: Receive ant question

2011-10-26 Thread Mark Beckwith
I think a front end protector is some good amount of insurance. I listen on other receivers while transmitting. I have cooked an IC746PRO doing this and it was quite annoying. It tricked me into thinking everything was fine because it worked okay for a good long while, but ultimately I cooked

Re: Topband: JD1BME Minami Torishima QSL card for 160m

2011-10-26 Thread Bernie McClenny, W3UR
Steve and Topbanders, JD1BME is a legitimate call, which I know definitely operated from Ogasawara (OC-073) and QSLed. I'm 99.9% sure the 2007 activity, supposedly from Minami Torishima, was bogus. I worked JD1BME on 80 in January and sent a direct QSL to the JA QSL bureau and have never received

Topband: Pseudo Inverted L & Radial Field

2011-10-26 Thread Steven Raas
Hello everyone, I have on my makeshift Inverted L about 21 Radials ranging from 60' long to 20' all fanned out from the feed of my antenna out to my property edges.I am tuning the 'L' in shack with a tuner, as without it.. SWR is approaching 2:1 I do realize laying radials on ground detunes them,

Re: Topband: Need help feeding tower on 160 AND 80

2011-10-26 Thread Brian Machesney
Thanks for all the responses. One respondent recalled hearing of success with a similar setup on the Towertalk reflector. By searching the archives for "shunt bands" I found an "existence theorem" at: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00194.html I followed the prescri