Mr Brown, that is a seriously good paper on the subject!!!..thanks for
posting it!!
Bud W0HG
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Tried it a few years ago as an experiment. Broke the antenna coax center
lead and inserted the crystal. Worked great on one frequency. Would have
been even sharper with a crystal holder capacitance balancing circuit like
communications receiver xtal filters of the early years. One heck of a
r
Hello Anton!
Here is a link to a 5 KHz 160 meter RX filter y INRAD. This may be what you are
asking about?
http://www.inrad.net/product.php?productid=231&cat=146&page=1
73 and Happy New Year,
Tim K3LR
-Original Message-
From: topband-boun...@contesting.com [mailto:topband-boun...@conte
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 09:38 +0800, Anton Moehammad wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I believe there is a 1825 KHZ xtal filter sell somewhere, can any body share
> their experience about put a narrow XTAL filter in front of their recv ? (CW
> works only)
>
>
>
> Ir Moeh AntonHendra
> Jambon Tengah
Hi everybody,
I believe there is a 1825 KHZ xtal filter sell somewhere, can any body share
their experience about put a narrow XTAL filter in front of their recv ? (CW
works only)
Ir Moeh AntonHendra
Jambon Tengah no 290 RT1/RW3
Magelang 56121
Indonesia
Mobile : +6285292611160
email : moe
here in Russia, we love cheap cables too, and of cource they are OK in
many many cases and serve for years, but I learned hard way and not once
that if your need a trouble free life then go proven quality cables and
matching connectors
any coax is just a transmition line ...
in a receiving syste
On 1/3/2012 11:48 AM, Doug Renwick wrote:
> One camp saying don't go cheap and another camp saying
> cheap is fine. I pay 5 cents a foot for flooded RG-6 from Shaw Cable.
> Copper coated steel center plus braid and foil. My receive 4 square run is
> about 700 feet. I can hear more than I can wor
Here we go again. One camp saying don't go cheap and another camp saying
cheap is fine. I pay 5 cents a foot for flooded RG-6 from Shaw Cable.
Copper coated steel center plus braid and foil. My receive 4 square run is
about 700 feet. I can hear more than I can work. I don't need expensive
RG-6
Times LMR-400 is an RG-213 equivilent. PL-259's can be put on both and will
need to be properly done. (no folding back the braid and screwing them
on..not wild about the new fangled crimping device either) Silver plated
connecters are much easier to install when it comes to soldering the brai
I would add that "sweep tested" doesn't necessarily mean the cable is
good quality. I've seen some "sweep tested" RG6 made for satellite use
that had maybe a 10% braid. I considered it to be horrible quality and
would never use it.
Keeping with a known brand that has a history of making a quality
It goes without saying that if one chooses to use cheap imported cable which
has not been scoped then all bets are off. My earlier comments regarding
RG-213 and RG-6 were based on the assumption that one would choose a reputable
brand of cable (for which one pays a premium).
Bill VE3NH
__
On 1/3/2012 7:06 AM, Andrey Fedorishchev wrote:
> Cheap RG6, the one with CCS center conductor, sometimes shows quiet high
> losses (few db per 300ft.) at 1-5 mhz and at the same time quiet low at
> higher frequencies;
>
> Not only the losses but signal leakage is important and not every brand of
>
Cheap RG6, the one with CCS center conductor, sometimes shows quiet high
losses (few db per 300ft.) at 1-5 mhz and at the same time quiet low at
higher frequencies;
Not only the losses but signal leakage is important and not every brand of
RG213 or RG6 is suitable at some instalations;
YMMV
2012
There is only ONE way to properly install a PL-259 connector and if you are not
using that method then anything can happen. New connectors won't make any
difference to system integrity unless they are installed properly.
As for cable, why would anyone use expensive cable like LMR-600 unless it
14 matches
Mail list logo
