D Rodman MD wrote:
> the receiver and watching the S meter. To our surprise the compromise
> position
> for the system (160 & 80m) in terms of jumper position does not produce
> the best
> receive signal one can obtain. It looks more like a monoband system
> rather than
> a duoband. By changing
All. It appears a decision needs to be made - whether or not to include
discussions about the new 630 meter band on the Topband reflector.
Initially - I didn't have a strong opinion about this - but it has become
obvious that I needed to decide which direction this list was going to go -
and comm
I should be operating the contest, but spent some of the afternoon
troubleshooting my DXE circular receive array. One thing led to another and I
decided to bench test one of the receivers. We pulled out my service monitor
(RF
signal source) and played with the jumpers on circuit board while list
I suspect it will become a battle between traditional CW and the digi modes
in such a small assignment. Building a transverter to go with any xcvr would
likely be easier than a scratch built CW rig.
Carl
KM1H
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Waters"
To: "topband"
Sent: Saturday, Feb
I wonder how some rigs would work that are supposedly "opened" up to transmit
"everywhere". Wouldn't the band-pass filters not allow any RF that isn't inside
the filters to get out of the rig. I have an IC-7800 and an IC-7700. I am just
wondering.
Gregg K9KL
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Tree wrote:
> - I am personally excited about the new "630 meter" band.
>
So am I ! :-)
I think it would be good to continue to allow discussions about it here,
even though this list is really meant for 160 meters.
How hard can it be to homebrew a CW transmit
