On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 18:46 -0400, ZR wrote:
> Yeah, I meant the current regulator. Shipboard power in the 30's wasnt
> exactly stable.
>
> A simple converter to take 160 and 80 down to the RAK's best tuning ratio
> band would be an interesting experiment.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
Hi Carl,
I gat
Yeah, I meant the current regulator. Shipboard power in the 30's wasnt
exactly stable.
A simple converter to take 160 and 80 down to the RAK's best tuning ratio
band would be an interesting experiment.
Carl
KM1H
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Cromwell"
To: "ZR"
Cc: "Thomas" ; ;
An interesting read.
American
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Radio-Wave+Propagation
1979 Russian/Soviet
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Radio-Wave+Propagation
73
Bruce
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
Bob, W7LR commented that in my original missive I left a dit off of
W7EKD's call it should have been W7EKB
sorry
mike w7dra
53 Year Old Mom Looks 33
The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried
htt
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 08:46 -0400, ZR wrote:
> The RAK and RAL are arguably the best regen ever manufactured. There was a
> pair of them in Emergency Radio aboard a USN tanker I spent a few years on
> in the 60's and I used them often to keep my code speed up by copying
> numbers groups.
>
> Iv
The RAK and RAL are arguably the best regen ever manufactured. There was a
pair of them in Emergency Radio aboard a USN tanker I spent a few years on
in the 60's and I used them often to keep my code speed up by copying
numbers groups.
Ive a RAK-7/RAL-7 pair here the past few years and have bee
Mike,
I had no idea what a RAL-7 receiver is so I did a Google search. I found that
it was built by RCA in 1930s, has 3-stage TRF front-end, and a regenerative
detector. There is a neat video on YouTube of a fellow administration of RAL-6
which I presume isn't terribly different than the RAL-7:
