Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Charles Yahrling
Just getting started modelling and looking for answers to questions not found in manual so far. For example, what exactly is included in the Return Loss figure shown in the SWR window? Just ground reflection loss, total system loss, something else? Trying to understand why Return Loss is

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Mike Waters
Chuck, SWR and return loss are related. Check these out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_loss http://www.minicircuits.com/app/DG03-111.pdf What are you modeling? 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Charles Yahrling cfytech2...@gmail.com wrote: Just getting started

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Tom W8JI
Return loss is just another misleading confusing way to express SWR. Return loss, like percentage reflected power, does not indicate any type of loss. It just expresses SWR in a different form. We can have 10:1 SWR, which would be a 1.743 dB return or mismatch loss or 67% reflected power,

Topband: topband report from 4V1JB

2014-12-05 Thread DALE LONG
Our plans for a 160m operation and CQWWCW entry were delayed due to supply issues and construction woes. THINGS ARE NOT EASY IN HAITI !!! We are very fortunate that we had any place to operate. We had only very low dipoles on the higher bands at the hotel/guesthouse. Thanks to the great

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Charlie Cunningham
Hi, Chuck Well return loss is a transmission line term that is a measure of the reflection on the line. So a transmission line that is terminated in its characteristic impedance would have 0 reflection, or infinite return loss or 1.0:1 VSWR. Conversely if the line was lossless and terminated in

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Richard Fry
We can have 67% reflected power and still have nearly 100% of transmitter power getting into the antenna and being radiated. Then could someone please explain why the manufacturers of ham, broadcast AM/FM/TV, and other transmitters specify the maximum SWR (e.g., minimum return loss) for the

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Charlie Cunningham
Well, I would respectfully disagree with Tom, that Return Loss is confusing or ,misleading. It's just another way of looking at reflections that often makes more sense of is more useful. For example, many filters etc. are specified in terms of their input return loss, usually in a 50 ohm

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Paul Christensen
Rich, It's an issue that's not usually seen in the broadcast engineering world where one frequency is transmitted for broadcast. Typically a transmitter will fold-back delivered power when its output Z is fixed (e.g., 50 or 70-ohm) and SWR exceeds some predetermined amount set by the

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Lloyd Berg - N9LB
The bad thing about high SWR in a high powered system are the resulting high voltage points and high current points generated by the forward and reflected waves. Those high voltages and current points can do a lot of damage to your equipment. 73 Lloyd - N9LB -Original Message- From:

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Richard Fry
Hello Paul, RE: Typically a transmitter will fold-back delivered power when its output Z is fixed (e.g., 50 or 70-ohm) and SWR exceeds some predetermined amount set by the manufacturer. This is typical of broadbanded solid-state amplifiers with a fixed output Z that use no output matching

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Paul Christensen
What did they call the teens to 20's antenna that had multiple feeds coming down from one end of the flatop to the other? Both the T and the fanned inverted L were popular on 200m in 1910-1920 just as the single-wire Inverted L is today on 160m. Back then, ops were obsessed with maximum

Re: Topband: EZNEC 5.0 +

2014-12-05 Thread Charlie Cunningham
Not sure that I can picture just what you are describing, Paul. Even though, I wasn't born until 1944, I've explored just about every type of antenna and I've modeled an awful lot of them. Of course the typical inverted L is just a monopole that is bent over at the top to reduce the required