Re: Topband: future of ham radio

2017-10-27 Thread JAYB1943
My latest non “black box” project – pixs attached—see u on 475 khz (kc) CW...?? hihi..jay ny2ny _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: future of ham radio

2017-10-27 Thread Radio KH6O
> From: > Hooray Nick ? best piece of writing on this whole subject by farIn my > 60+ years of hamming, the changes in technology is EXACTLY what has kept me > so interested over that time...If all there was today was still AM phone and > xtal-controlled rigs, I guess

Re: Topband: K2AV Counterpoise

2017-10-27 Thread k8...@alphacomm.net
Hi Dan, I can see where you've reached your conclusion, but your comment that "Rudy seems to say..." is a good qualifier. Let's get back to basics, say with a classic 1/4 WL vertical. The theoretical impedance against an in infinite ground is 36 ohms. From free space modeling, one quickly

Topband: FW: 160m Vertical Ideas?

2017-10-27 Thread Ian Fugler
Is it possible to run a 128 foot wire to the top of the 89 foot tower, then across to the top of the 102 foot tower? If the towers are 35 feet apart, that gives you pretty much a 160m quarterwave. As many radials at the base as you can manage, would be a rather good (mainly vertical) aerial.

Topband: 160m Vertical Ideas?

2017-10-27 Thread Ed via Topband
Greetings! Trying to figure out my scheme for 160m. I currently have three crank up towers about 35’ apart from one another. One cranks up to 106’, the next to 70’ and third, to 89’. I figured I could shunt feed one of the taller towers and call it good but I’m concerned about interaction

Topband: the future of ham radio

2017-10-27 Thread JAYB1943
Hooray Nick – best piece of writing on this whole subject by farIn my 60+ years of hamming, the changes in technology is EXACTLY what has kept me so interested over that time...If all there was today was still AM phone and xtal-controlled rigs, I guess I would have looked for some more

Re: Topband: More on radials

2017-10-27 Thread DXer
Hi Gary, This is the first time I hear about the DOG. Would you have online references about it? I'll Google it, but if you have goods ones handy, please send them to me privately (unless others here are interested as well). Thanks and 73. Vince, VA3VF On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:00 AM, kd9sv

Re: Topband: The Future of Ham Radio

2017-10-27 Thread W0MU Mike Fatchett
The sad part is that most, not all, don't care if they hobby dies.  They are simply in it for themselves. On 10/26/2017 11:32 PM, WT2P - CJ Johnson wrote: (this is a non-topband related matter but I feel I must chime in -- mostly because if you scare away the next generation of topbanders,

Re: Topband: More on radials

2017-10-27 Thread kd9sv
About 20 years ago I did the DOG (dipole on ground) experiment) at my northern Indiana location. Many others have likely done their own DOG tests but my results were that the dipole needed to be shortened by nearly 50% to still be resonant when lying on the grassy soil at this location. Based on

Re: Topband: subject

2017-10-27 Thread DXer
I agree! This thread about asking the moderator to stop the other thread has run its course. I hope we won't have a thread now asking for the thread that asked for the other thread to be terminated started. Enjoy the nice discussion about radials. 73 de Vince, VA3VF On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at

Re: Topband: More on radials

2017-10-27 Thread Petr Ourednik
Mike, check it: http://www.w0btu.com/Optimum_number_of_ground_radials_vs_radial_length.html http://www.ok1rr.com/index.php/antennas/45-notes-on-ground-systems 73 - Petr, OK1RP http://ok1rp.blogspot.com On Fri, Oct 27, 2017, at 03:03 PM, Michael Walker wrote: > Here is my problem I am trying to

Re: Topband: Shortened Radial Experiments

2017-10-27 Thread George Taft via Topband
As a practical application, the "Battle Creek Special" is configured with shortened radicals; 30 X 60' for mni years now.   It's success is well known. We found, that when 1/4 wvl radials were furnished, DXpeditions often did not have space for deployment.  And used only a few of the radials

Re: Topband: FT8

2017-10-27 Thread S57AD
I know Yaesu FT707, but am not aware of FT8 :D 73, Mirko, S57AD 2017-10-27 14:37 GMT+02:00 Greg Chartrand via Topband < topband@contesting.com>: > Dear moderator enough is enough! > BTW since the discussion started, the FT8 activity has really picked up!! > Greg

Topband: FT8

2017-10-27 Thread Greg Chartrand via Topband
Dear moderator enough is enough! BTW since the discussion started, the FT8 activity has really picked up!! Greg - Greg Chartrand - W7MY Richland, WA. W7MY Home Page: http://webpages.charter.net/w7my/ _ Topband Reflector

Topband: G3YRO Just Joined !

2017-10-27 Thread Roger Kennedy
Hi All Despite being a keen 160m DX-er for the past 45 years, I've just finally joined this Reflector ! So I'm looking forward to reading 160m related posts. What made me decide to join was reading through the 160m receiver comparisons - very interesting. I stayed with my FT101E (with 250Hz

Re: Topband: K2AV Counterpoise

2017-10-27 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
This entire thread has had some really good stuff here and there on radials. Nicely done, gentlemen and a really good discussion. :>)) Is there a reason why it will now get buried in the archives with a searchable subject of "Topband K2AV counterpoise" ? ROFL. Or was this a thread hijack back