My latest non “black box” project – pixs attached—see u on 475 khz (kc)
CW...?? hihi..jay ny2ny
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
> From:
> Hooray Nick ? best piece of writing on this whole subject by farIn my
> 60+ years of hamming, the changes in technology is EXACTLY what has kept me
> so interested over that time...If all there was today was still AM phone and
> xtal-controlled rigs, I guess
Hi Dan,
I can see where you've reached your conclusion, but your comment that
"Rudy seems to say..." is a good qualifier.
Let's get back to basics, say with a classic 1/4 WL vertical. The
theoretical impedance against an in infinite ground is 36 ohms. From
free space modeling, one quickly
Is it possible to run a 128 foot wire to the top of the 89 foot tower, then
across to the top of the 102 foot tower? If the towers are 35 feet apart, that
gives you pretty much a 160m quarterwave. As many radials at the base as you
can manage, would be a rather good (mainly vertical) aerial.
Greetings!
Trying to figure out my scheme for 160m. I currently have three crank up
towers about 35’ apart from one another. One cranks up to 106’, the next to 70’
and third, to 89’.
I figured I could shunt feed one of the taller towers and call it good but I’m
concerned about interaction
Hooray Nick – best piece of writing on this whole subject by farIn my
60+ years of hamming, the changes in technology is EXACTLY what has kept me
so interested over that time...If all there was today was still AM phone and
xtal-controlled rigs, I guess I would have looked for some more
Hi Gary,
This is the first time I hear about the DOG. Would you have online
references about it?
I'll Google it, but if you have goods ones handy, please send them to me
privately (unless others here are interested as well).
Thanks and 73.
Vince, VA3VF
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:00 AM, kd9sv
The sad part is that most, not all, don't care if they hobby dies. They
are simply in it for themselves.
On 10/26/2017 11:32 PM, WT2P - CJ Johnson wrote:
(this is a non-topband related matter but I feel I must chime in --
mostly because if you scare away the next generation of topbanders,
About 20 years ago I did the DOG (dipole on ground) experiment) at my
northern Indiana location. Many others have likely done their own DOG tests
but my results were that the dipole needed to be shortened by nearly 50% to
still be resonant when lying on the grassy soil at this location. Based on
I agree! This thread about asking the moderator to stop the other thread
has run its course.
I hope we won't have a thread now asking for the thread that asked for the
other thread to be terminated started.
Enjoy the nice discussion about radials.
73 de Vince, VA3VF
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at
Mike,
check it:
http://www.w0btu.com/Optimum_number_of_ground_radials_vs_radial_length.html
http://www.ok1rr.com/index.php/antennas/45-notes-on-ground-systems
73 - Petr, OK1RP
http://ok1rp.blogspot.com
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017, at 03:03 PM, Michael Walker wrote:
> Here is my problem I am trying to
As a practical application, the "Battle Creek Special" is configured with
shortened radicals; 30 X 60' for mni years now. It's success is well known.
We found, that when 1/4 wvl radials were furnished, DXpeditions often did not
have space for deployment. And used only a few of the radials
I know Yaesu FT707, but am not aware of FT8 :D
73, Mirko, S57AD
2017-10-27 14:37 GMT+02:00 Greg Chartrand via Topband <
topband@contesting.com>:
> Dear moderator enough is enough!
> BTW since the discussion started, the FT8 activity has really picked up!!
> Greg
Dear moderator enough is enough!
BTW since the discussion started, the FT8 activity has really picked up!!
Greg - Greg Chartrand -
W7MY Richland, WA. W7MY Home Page: http://webpages.charter.net/w7my/
_
Topband Reflector
Hi All
Despite being a keen 160m DX-er for the past 45 years, I've just finally
joined this Reflector ! So I'm looking forward to reading 160m related
posts.
What made me decide to join was reading through the 160m receiver
comparisons - very interesting. I stayed with my FT101E (with 250Hz
This entire thread has had some really good stuff here and there on
radials. Nicely done, gentlemen and a really good discussion.
:>)) Is there a reason why it will now get buried in the archives with a
searchable subject of "Topband K2AV counterpoise" ? ROFL. Or was this a
thread hijack back
16 matches
Mail list logo