I worked OK1RD in 2011 on 2 Meter EME. Don't k now if he is still active
73, PeteR N8PR
Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters -339 OK1YQ .
Who is it ??
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181116-A4.pdf#page=1=a
uto,-12,848
--
Nick, UY0ZG
Doug,
If you have the room, here is an alternative that I am using now at ZF9CW.
I believe this would be better than a coil at the base.
Make that vertical your 160m transmit antenna by adding two wires attached
to the top and going out as far as you can so the ends are as high as you
can get
He filed LOTW back in 2009 with callsign of OK1RD
John k9uwa
> >>"There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards. 73
>
> Clive GM3POI"
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
He filed LOTW back in 2009 with callsign of OK1RD
John k9uwa
> >>"There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards. 73
>
> Clive GM3POI"
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
This is a very well-established fact! See
http://www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html.
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018, 5:56 AM Clive GM3POI wrote:
> My take on this is that having had a low inverted vee at about 80ft and a
> top loaded vertical over a very good ground system to compare
On 11/17/2018 3:42 AM, Roger Kennedy wrote:
I think most people know I use a horizontal 160m Dipole as my main antenna .
But my 6ft Receiving Loop is vertically polarised . . . so it's quite
Roger G3YRO
Assuming you mean the loop is a 6 ft diameter circle,
you would typically have
Hi Doug, I've got exactly the same setup. I use two coils, a 2uH shunt
coil, one side of which is grounded, and a 22uH loading coil that
connects to the top of the shunt coil at the bottom of the antenna.
You drive the antenna where the two coils intersect. Realistically,
you'll probably have to
Folks,
Hopefully the ARRL will look into this and
act in a way we all will be satisfied but
they can't act until they have done their
own due diligence. Informing DXCC about it
is the best we can hope to do unless they
do not act on it. I expect they will act
on it when they find the truth
Regarding 10 kHz harmonics from BCB stations... last year I was using my
HQ-140 receiver for casual SW and ham monitoring at my computer desk. With
a full size 160 meter the Hammarlund overloaded to the point where I was
hearing an IMD beatnote at every 10 kHz spot on the band. Fortunately, I
Gentlemen,
I have been lurking in the background for over a year there have been some
excellent learning possibilities.
Thank you all. now on to my question.
I have a 1/4 wave vertical (about 66 feet) for 75-80 meters I would like
to try and make it resonate on 1.825. If I put the analyzer on it
ily with
fake *cards* presumably approved by a friendly field checker (or
overworked ARRL staff person at a hamfest).
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2018-11-17 3:46 AM, uy0zg wrote:
Who makes this list - amateur radio, topbander or robot ...?
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181117-
/www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181117-A4.pdf#page=1=a%20%20uto,-12,848
Nick,
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
Time to take action on this one please
Thanks to all who find the time to do so.
73 JEFF
From: k...@aol.com
To: n...@n4is.com
Sent: 11/17/2018 3:56:25 PM Coordinated Universal Time
Subject: Re: Topband: Fwd: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters OK1YQ (OK1RD) Legitimacy???!!!
JC and other 160m ops
PLEASE
gt;>>
> >>>> The DXCC standings list is generated automatically from the DXCC
> >>>> records (not LotW).
> >>>>
> >>>> OK1YQ (OK1RD) has been "cheating" DXCC for decades - primarily with
> >>>> fake *cards* presumably
ed ARRL staff person at a hamfest).
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2018-11-17 3:46 AM, uy0zg wrote:
Who makes this list - amateur radio, topbander or robot ...?
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181117-A4.pdf#page=1=a%20%20uto,-12,848
Nick, UY0ZG
_
Searchable A
, nothing about this station.
Wrong call ?
Jean-Paul F6FYA/TM4Q
Envoy? de mon iPad
> Le 17 nov. 2018 ? 01:06, donov...@starpower.net a ?crit :
>
>
> JC,
>
>
> I have well over a million QSOs in my computer log but not even a single QSO
> with OK1YQ
>
>
> 7
>>"There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards. 73
Clive GM3POI"
Thanks Clive. I was under the mistaken impression that ARRL had closed
the previous loopholes in their paper card process but that is clearly not
the case. This (paper cheating on 160 cards) has been
Thanks JC. LoTW does in fact require a QSO check from the other station for the
confirmation to occur. Unless the other station uploads QSO details a
confirmation does not occur.
I’m not suggesting there hasn’t been bogus activity but I can tell you if there
is proof a flaw or breach has
He could upload under a previous call
Sent from my iPad
> On Nov 17, 2018, at 8:37 AM, Clive GM3POI wrote:
>
> There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards. 73
> Clive GM3POI
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On
...?
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181117-A4.pdf#page=1=a%20%20uto,-12,848
Nick, UY0ZG
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
Apparently, all he wants to do is hang the award on his shack wall, either
to impress visitors or himself??
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018, 7:47 AM Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>
> ... OK1YQ (OK1RD) has been "cheating" DXCC for decades - primarily with
> fake *cards* presumably
field checker (or
overworked ARRL staff person at a hamfest).
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2018-11-17 3:46 AM, uy0zg wrote:
Who makes this list - amateur radio, topbander or robot ...?
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181117-A4.pdf#page=1=a%20%20uto,-12,848
amateur radio, topbander or robot ...?
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181117-A4.pdf#page=1=a%20%20uto,-12,848
Nick, UY0ZG
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting
Thanks JC. LoTW does in fact require a QSO check from the other station
for the confirmation to occur. Unless the other station uploads QSO
details a confirmation does not occur.
I'm not suggesting there hasn't been bogus activity but I can tell you
if there is proof a flaw or breach has
Yes
" Here you can query Logbook to find out the last time log data was
uploaded for a particular call sign.
Last upload for OK1YQ: No log data found "
Nick, UY0ZG
Clive GM3POI писал 2018-11-17 15:37:
There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards.
73
Clive GM3POI
sumably approved by a friendly field checker (or
overworked ARRL staff person at a hamfest).
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2018-11-17 3:46 AM, uy0zg wrote:
Who makes this list - amateur radio, topbander or robot ...?
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181117-A4.pdf#page=1=a%20%20uto,-
There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards. 73
Clive GM3POI
-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
n...@n4is.com
Sent: 17 November 2018 13:29
To: w...@w5zn.org; 'topband'
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
Hi Joel
I have the same impression as Bill mentioned. 160m paper QSL requires a card
checker, however LOTW confirmation does not have the same process, no QSO or
QSL check at all. We've seen 160m " QSO's" on Club Log and subsequent
confirmation on LOTW on plain day light.
73's
JC
N4IS
Folks - I'm not exactly understanding the LoTW comments on this thread.
If it is referring to the LoTW screen shot totals listed by OK1RD on his
website then that is the combined totals in his DXCC record, not the
totals confirmed solely via LoTW so a "hack" has not necessarily
occurred.
Bill, all indications are that he got his fake OK1RD 2008 DXCC totals using
paper cards, not LOTW. I would expect he got his fake 2018 totals in a
similar way.
Example fake card, as deconstructed by G3TXF:
http://www.g3txf.com/dxtrip/Fake-C21XF/Fake-C21.html
One thing is for sure, he's
Hi Jeff
We have a similar problem with several "PY" faking QSL, QSO and even LOTW
confirmation by the DX operator. We've been reporting (we.. N4IS, PY2XB , PY2RO
and PY5EG), documenting on paper, talking and meeting with ARRL officials
including the DXCC desk for several years, and ARRL just
Hi Steve.
You are 100 % right, the V works like a top hat for a vertical TX antenna.
I it simple to detune any vertical TX antenna. Vertical TX antenna is the only
way to work DX on topband!
You may ask about the inverted V or low dipole, they are not 100% horizontal,
actually they are 50%
>>Doesn't say much for the DXCC checking process either. 73 Clive GM3POI
Guys this was probably done by OK1RD to embarrass ARRL/DXCC, in retaliation
for ARRL (correctly) removing his bogus listing over 10 years ago. He
probably found a way to hack LOTW and no human monitored the result. I'm
My take on this is that having had a low inverted vee at about 80ft and a
top loaded vertical over a very good ground system to compare against each
other. I have found the following that despite the vertical being short 60ft
with the exception of stations within 200miles the vertical is always
I think most people know I use a horizontal 160m Dipole as my main antenna .
. .
But my 6ft Receiving Loop is vertically polarised . . . so it's quite
interesting to see the difference in signals between the two. (I have a
pre-amp that makes local signals the same strength on the Loop)
Most EU
FYI
There is a NEW EMAIL ADDRESS for the ARRL DXCC DESK - it is dxccad...@arrl.org
Pls send your comments to this email address for investigation and possible
action!
Thanks!
73 JEFF Vy2ZM
In a message dated 11/17/2018 10:45:27 AM Coordinated Universal Time,
lennart.michaels...@telia.com
From: k...@aol.com
To: sm2...@telia.com
Cc: d...@arrl.org
Sent: 11/17/2018 10:33:41 AM Coordinated Universal Time
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters OK1YQ (OK1RD) Legitimacy???!!!
Hmmm again
Okay - now I remember this guy and his shenanigans from way back. OK1RD (now
masquerading
If OK1YQ is OK1RD as you say Bob, then pse read:
http://www.g3txf.com/dxtrip/Fake-C21XF/Fake-C21.html
https://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index.php?action=printpage;topic=110968.0
73
Peter SM2CEW
At 00:32 2018-11-17, Bob W4DR wrote:
OK1YQ is actually OK1RD
-Original Message- From:
Doesn't say much for the DXCC checking process either. 73 Clive GM3POI
-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of k1zm--- via
Topband
Sent: 17 November 2018 08:16
To: w...@mindspring.com; donov...@starpower.net; topband@contesting.com
Subject:
G’day
One way to get around the problem Frank W3LPL outlines below is to have one
general/TX 160m antenna that you switch between vertical and horizontal
polarisation.
If you can get up an inverted-V or flat-top dipole at 60 to 120 feet and feed
it with open wire that runs away from the
Who makes this list - amateur radio, topbander or robot ...?
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181117-A4.pdf#page=1=a%20%20uto,-12,848
Nick, UY0ZG
k1zm--- via Topband писал 2018-11-17 10:15:
hm
Why would anyone with a LEGITIMATE 339 DXCC entities made on 160m made
Anywhere, nothing about this station.
Wrong call ?
Jean-Paul F6FYA/TM4Q
Envoyé de mon iPad
> Le 17 nov. 2018 à 01:06, donov...@starpower.net a écrit :
>
>
> JC,
>
>
> I have well over a million QSOs in my computer log but not even a single QSO
> with OK1YQ
>
>
> 73
> Frank
> W3LPL
hm
Why would anyone with a LEGITIMATE 339 DXCC entities made on 160m made as
licensed station OK1RD submit a DXCC total as CALLSIGN OK1YQ?
That's kind of wacky.isn't it? If it is legit - then congrats!
73 JEFF K1ZM
In a message dated 11/17/2018 12:33:17 AM Coordinated Universal Time,
43 matches
Mail list logo
