Re: Topband: The Magic-T

2021-02-10 Thread Jorge Diez - CX6VM
Hello KD9SV made a great Magic T https://www.dxengineering.com/parts/svp-sv-rsc 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W El mar, 9 feb 2021 a las 23:02, Lee STRAHAN () escribió: > Hi Low Band people, >Nice presentation Steve. I would like to point out that Beverage users > or even other phased antenna users s

Topband: UA9BA Spitfire antenna

2021-02-10 Thread Alexander Teimurazov
https://dxnews.com/ua9ba-spitfire-160m/ 73 Al 4L5A _ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Topband: KM5KG network designer

2021-02-10 Thread Eric Scace K3NA
Grant KM5KG (SK) had a Windows program for impedance matching network design that provided current and voltage levels for each component in the system, based on the power passing through the network to the load, as well as many other useful features for reducing a theoretical design into a pr

Re: Topband: KM5KG network designer

2021-02-10 Thread Chris G3SVL
Hi Eric, Long time no speak - hope you are well. Have you looked at SimSmith? It appears to do some of the things you are looking for. Plenty of videos on YouTube or start here perhaps: https://www.w0qe.com/SimSmith.html 73 Chris, G3SVL On 10/02/2021 17:16, Eric Scace K3NA wrote: Gran

Topband: The "Magic-T" vs 0 degree and 180 degree hybrid combiner/splitters

2021-02-10 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Ham radio literature often IMHO misuses the term "magic tee" to refer to a transformer-based 0 degree hybrid combiner/splitter. AFAIK, a magic tee is a WAVEGUIDE device as explained here: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/microwave_engineering/microwave_engineering_eh_plane_tee.htm and here: http

Topband: The Magic-T

2021-02-10 Thread P H via Topband
My impression is that a hybrid combiner, which introduces 90 degree shift (hence two identical signals of amplitude A fed to its inputs will give in total a signal with the amplitude of 1.41*A) is 3dB less efficient in comparison to a simple combiner where A+A gives 2*A at the output. Do you hav

Re: Topband: The "Magic-T" vs 0 degree and 180 degree hybrid combiner/splitters

2021-02-10 Thread Lee STRAHAN
Hi All, Rick I have to agree with you up to a point. Your 9 circle and other 8 circle receiving arrays except mine are on wide footprints and only use 4 active antennas at a time. All of my antennas are reduced footprint antenna arrays which require much more phasing accuracy for optimum per

Re: Topband: The Magic-T

2021-02-10 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
On 2021-02-10 5:25 PM, P H via Topband wrote: A loss of 3 dB may be like "to be or not to be" of a QSO on 160 meters. That is extremely unlikely. The limiting factor on 160 meters is signal to noise ratio, not absolute signal levels. Most amateur receivers have absolute sensitivities of -130

Re: Topband: KM5KG network designer

2021-02-10 Thread Jim Brown
On 2/10/2021 9:16 AM, Eric Scace K3NA wrote: More generally, is there a modern software tool available Hi Eric, Many of us are using SimSmith for modeling anything that can fit on a Smith Chart. Freeware, mature, runs in Java, imports Touchstone files from measurements and antenna models (in

Re: Topband: UA9BA Spitfire antenna

2021-02-10 Thread John Kaufmann via Topband
This antenna was clearly working well at UA2FW in the recent CQ 160 contest. When I listened on the band, UA2FW was, by far, the strongest signal coming out of Europe in mediocre conditions. Normally northern Europe, including UA2, is at a disadvantage in terms of propagation to the US. Also, UA2

Re: Topband: The Magic-T

2021-02-10 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
The 90 degree hybrid is a third type of hybrid combiner, distinct from the 0 degree and 180 degree types. It is typically used for 4 square phasing. All 3 combiners basically have a 3 dB insertion loss for signals having appropriate phase conditions. What you say is true to the extent that usin