Re: Topband: FW: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Dave AA6YQ
+ AA6YQ comments below You point out what is really an inconsistent CQ rule for USA-CA (not allowing LotW QSOs and requiring paper QSLs). Of course this was the traditional way to submit when the program began and they had the little blue booklet you filled in the details, and you get your

Re: Topband: FW: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread AB2E Darrell
Jim, You point out what is really an inconsistent CQ rule for USA-CA (not allowing LotW QSOs and requiring paper QSLs). Of course this was the traditional way to submit when the program began and they had the little blue booklet you filled in the details, and you get your friends to view your

Re: Topband: FW: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Jim Brown
On 2/6/2023 12:07 PM, uy0zg via Topband wrote: I must be missing something again.  The founder of the award creates the program. I enter my LotW password there and it sees all my USA-CA. Or is it wrong? Perhaps I wrote poorly, Nick. Yes, the county information is there for LOTW users who

Re: Topband: FW: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread uy0zg via Topband
I must be missing something again. The founder of the award creates the program. I enter my LotW password there and it sees all my USA-CA. Or is it wrong? --- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua Jim Brown писал 2023-02-06 21:27: On 2/6/2023 4:46 AM, Clive GM3POI wrote: Well I have never

Re: Topband: FW: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Jim Brown
On 2/6/2023 4:46 AM, Clive GM3POI wrote: Well I have never checked from here, but I have worked WAS twice during a single weekend and have over 8600 Qs with the USA on 160. Great work on that, Clive! But have you done so in the last 3-4 years on any mode other than FT8? From my QTH near San

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Dave AA6YQ
+ AA6YQ comments below USA-CA, although a significant achievement, has very few applications, but many participants. CQ is not investing in USA-CA. CQ spent money to add WAZ and WPX in LOTW. CQ's other awards do not generate enough $$ to be invested into LOTW programming. + I don't know about

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Paul Antos
The “Toplist” awards are run by MARAC. This, and all other awards, are after one achieves USA-CA , which is run by CQ. They do not require confirmations, and are on the honor system. It plays for a very small set of amateurs who can’t get working counties out of their system. Paul NS2N

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Charles Morrison
USA-CA KI4KWR is the current award manager, not NX0X. NX0X is old info. On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 10:39 AM uy0zg wrote: > > > > "USA-CA = volunteers = 1 application per week." > > It is clear that for really serious awards there should be fewer > applications. But, I repeat, with the right

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Saulius Zalnerauskas
TNX for nice link https://countyhunter.com/Toplist/CCAtoplist.htm Even I have more counties, than Laci OM2VL on 6 meters :) To UY0ZG - this is not national award, but private. I wrote to NX0X, waiting answer, as for me is also very interesting about LOTW. Calculated - with my income, I need

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread uy0zg via Topband
"USA-CA = volunteers = 1 application per week." It is clear that for really serious awards there should be fewer applications. But, I repeat, with the right advertising there will be many times more people (especially from Europe) willing to announce their results. DXCC, IOTA is almost

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Charles Morrison
IOTA = a corporation = 100 award applications per week USA-CA = volunteers = 1 application per week. On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 10:06 AM uy0zg wrote: > Maybe I don't understand something. But the IOTA program has no > > problem taking data from LotW. The award itself can be sent > >

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread uy0zg via Topband
Maybe I don't understand something. But the IOTA program has no problem taking data from LotW. The award itself can be sent electronically. The main thing is to design the list effectively. I don't see any global problems --- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua Charles Morrison

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Charles Morrison
USA-CA, although a significant achievement, has very few applications, but many participants. CQ is not investing in USA-CA. CQ spent money to add WAZ and WPX in LOTW. CQ's other awards do not generate enough $$ to be invested into LOTW programming. JARL's JCC/JCG/AJA awards are well documented,

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread uy0zg via Topband
Charlie Thank you. But this list does not look impressive. In today's world, design and advertising play a huge role. People need a separate list for the 160 m band CW/PHONE on the official website. Then there will be a lot of people willing to claim their results. --- Nick, UY0ZG

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread FRED BELGHAUS
Saulius (and Nick). I copy verbatim the following from the USA-CA Rules: 1. . Unless otherwise indicated on QSL cards or in an electronic confirmation database, the QTH printed on cards or entered into an electronic confirmation database profile will determine county identity. ",,,an electronic

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Charles Morrison
Nick, I have never seen a complete list of award holders. The award can be endorsed for single band. -Charlie N1RR The current TOPLIST by band is here: https://countyhunter.com/Toplist/CCAtoplist.htm On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 7:03 AM uy0zg via Topband wrote: > Hi > > > Where can I see the list of

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread uy0zg via Topband
The founders can solve everything with LotW (like IOTA). About money. Yes - this is a problem for Ukraine now. Prices need to be set taking into account the general situation in the world... --- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua Saulius Zalnerauskas писал 2023-02-06 15:15: LOTW doesn't

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Saulius Zalnerauskas
LOTW doesn't count at all.. A very expensive pleasure - this award. Sam LY5W On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:37 PM uy0zg via Topband wrote: > Thanks Jan > > Luis said it right - that's the real prize at 160m. It is inaccessible > to casual passersby. > > "I am not an award chaser, but the real

Re: Topband: FW: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread uy0zg via Topband
Hi Clive If the founders publish a sheet titled USA - 500 ( or 1000 )CW/SSB 160 m , then you should definitely send in an application for this award. It will be the most prestigious award for topbanders. All European crooks will drool with envy. It would be virtually impossible for a

Topband: FW: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread Clive GM3POI
Hi Nick, Well I have never checked from here, but I have worked WAS twice during a single weekend and have over 8600 Qs with the USA on 160. That is without trying to make a habit of working USA on a daily basis. So I am sure someone like me should have worked that award but just not claimed

Re: Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread uy0zg via Topband
Thanks Jan Luis said it right - that's the real prize at 160m. It is inaccessible to casual passersby. "I am not an award chaser, but the real difficult ones. After completing the 160 m. WAS in 1997, it took many more years to get the basic 500 Counties confirmed, and now I am very proud

Topband: The USA-CA Awards

2023-02-06 Thread uy0zg via Topband
Hi Where can I see the list of recipients of this award? https://countyhunter.com/cq.htm Does anyone from Europe have a USA - 500 or USA - 1000 award for working on the 160m band? If there is, it really is a very, very serious result . -- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua