Re: Topband: [wsjtgroup] Re: AM interference on 1840

2019-05-21 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
I wasn't clear. I meant BCB filters at their receivers would not help those stations being bothered by the second harmonic. K7CW On Tuesday, May 21, 2019, 8:42:15 PM UTC, Paul Kiesel via Topband wrote: Unless I lost track of the conversation, we are talking about a stati

Re: Topband: [wsjtgroup] Re: AM interference on 1840

2019-05-21 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
Unless I lost track of the conversation, we are talking about a station in Colombia whose second harmonic is interfering with reception on 1840 in Uruguay. A BCB filter would likely not help the stations being bothered by this second harmonic. K7CW On Tuesday, May 21, 2019, 7:37:56 PM UTC

Re: Topband: AM interference on 1840

2019-05-21 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
I think 1840 works for most. Moving the FT8 frequency because of one second harmonic of a broadcast signal is not called for. Getting the broadcast station to clean up its signal is. There are other activities on 160 that would have to change frequency if the FT8 frequency were to change. There

Re: Topband: XR0ZRC?

2019-03-26 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
I worked 3G0Z in 2001. It was a six-meters only DXpedition. They had two stations operating then. One was located in a local's house located on the western shore of San Juan Bautista and the other was located on the eastern shore at an inn. The reason for having both locations was that the stat

Re: Topband: Topband Phenomenon

2019-02-03 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
I don't have an explanation for this, but I had a similar experience during the contest. My receiveantenna is an unterminated BOG running alongside the road in front. I struggled to get F4HEC's call because he was so weak. He persisted and I finally got it. He was the first European that I hear

Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters

2018-11-16 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
OK1RD is active on 6m EME. Paul, K7CW On Fri, 11/16/18, Tom Haavisto wrote: Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters To: w...@mindspring.com Cc: "TopBand List" , "Frank Donovan" Date: Friday, November 16, 2018, 4:58 PM Neither of those c

Re: Topband: 160m Condx

2018-11-12 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
Aren't US and Canadian broadcast stations on frequencies that are divisible by 10, like 900, 910, 920 kHz? That would place harmonics on 1800, 1820, 1840, etc. I think I read somewhere before that European broadcast stations are separated by 9 kHz. Could be remembering wrong about that, though. 73

Re: Topband: 160m Activity

2018-10-19 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
Last night was the best I've experienced on 160. Well, okay, I haven't been on the band in any kind of seriousness until recently, but still... Gosh, when I tuned the band I almost immediately came across OH0Z! Hearing Europe on CW is very rare for me. Jim, W7FI, keeps watch on solar activity and

Re: Topband: Why no NA 160m Activity?

2018-10-17 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
I listen for CW and FT8. My receive antenna is an unterminated BOG which does a barely acceptable job for what it is. I often hear South American, Pacific and Asian stations on CW, but rarely hear Europe. I know my receive antenna is not up to the job, but there is not much I can do about it becaus

Re: Topband: VE1ZZ Jack Leahy

2017-11-10 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
Hi Jeff, I'm a 50 MHz aficionado and recently decided to try 160 meters. A while back, there was a writeup about Jack in one of the magazines. The article included some photos of Jack's station, one of which was of his giant 6-meter quagi - the one he used to work Turkey on that band. I liked

Re: Topband: P.O.A.

2017-05-21 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
On the other hand... Tim Pettis, KL7WE (SK), in chasing WAS on 432, was known to visit needed rare states with a portable EME station, put it on from there, and work his own station (as well as others) to get credit for those states. Another ham would operate his home station. This action of vi

Topband: Common Mode RF Currents Disrupting JT Transmissions

2017-02-17 Thread Paul Kiesel via Topband
Hello - I'm not able to run more than 150 watts when using JT65 on 160. RF gets into the computer and disrupts the JT signal. I don't have this problem on 6m where I run QRO using JT65 on EME. I installed ferrite beads on all radio and computer leads, with multiple beads on coax cables. My ante