Looking for some tricks on getting LOTW download report into a more usable
format.
Yes, I can import the adif it generates into N1MM+ to get each QSL on one
line, then export another adif, then import to a spreadsheet or database.
But that's not so slick, and loses some detail. I guess I could
On Fri,7/31/2015 5:19 AM, Charles Yahrling wrote:
Looking for some tricks on getting LOTW download report into a more usable
format.
I use DXKeeper, an excellent general purpose ham logger. It imports and
exports ADIF files, and with a few mouse clicks, uploads and downloads
automatically to
Try the ADIF to Excel to ADIF converter by DL1HW
On Jul 31, 2015 8:19 AM, Charles Yahrling cfytech2...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking for some tricks on getting LOTW download report into a more usable
format.
Yes, I can import the adif it generates into N1MM+ to get each QSL on one
line, then
On 12/19/2012 2:50 AM, Raoul Coetzee wrote:
Like most of us I have been reading and trying to absorb the excellent
technical information in this group, but really, personal
attacks and comments should be avoided.
Or is this simply normal, a reflection of what is happening on the bands too?
I
Thanks Raoul for the excellent posting.
I have to admit to coming close to having to put the list back into full
moderation.
Let's clean it up guys. If you don't believe we can by civil here and
discuss technical subjects, then you will find your posts taking longer to
show up.
Tree
On Tue,
Hello Raoul,
Yes there are a few 160 meter gentlemen and gentlegirls still left.
If you notice, the flaming remarks mostly are made by one person. Several years
ago he was
banned from this reflector. I do have to agree that it really gets disgusting.
Thank god there
is a delete key on
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: LoTW, Ground mounted 1/2 wave etc.
Hello Raoul,
Yes there are a few 160 meter gentlemen and gentlegirls still left.
If you notice, the flaming remarks mostly are made by one person. Several
years
ago he was
banned from
KM1H should be banned once again.
Dave WX7G
On Dec 19, 2012 9:59 AM, HAROLD SMITH JR w0ri...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Hello Raoul,
Yes there are a few 160 meter gentlemen and gentlegirls still left.
If you notice, the flaming remarks mostly are made by one person. Several
years
ago he was
Like most of us I have been reading and trying to absorb the excellent
technical information in this group, but really, personal
attacks and comments should be avoided.
Or is this simply normal, a reflection of what is happening on the bands too?
I hope this comes to an end, I would hate to
Group
http://k4tcg.org/
http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en
Tennessee QSO Party
http://www.tnqp.org/
Elecraft K2 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
Elecraft K3/100 #
--- On Fri, 2/17/12, Eddy Swynar deswy...@xplornet.ca wrote:
From: Eddy Swynar deswy...@xplornet.ca
Subject: Re: Topband
Subject: Re: Topband: LOTW Participation
On 2012-02-16, at 9:25 PM, Jeff wrote:
...so we can get those coveted awards we all like.
Hi Jeff et al,
I certainly have nothing against LotW, or the folks who swear by it. It is
the coming thing IMHO, and given time will surely render hardcopy QSLs
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:05 AM, gedk...@aol.com wrote:
It's simple why some don't use LOTH it's called $ $ $ $
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
It doesn't cost anything to upload your log to LOTW. The only time $ $ $
$ is a factor is if
Like VE3XZ I like real cards. But, striking out for my goal of over 300
on each HF band, less 160 where I don't have enough goo nor enough
years, I concluded the expense could be better directed toward making
the QSO, than confirming it.
My logger (DXLabSuite) shows in its packet application
LotW is great for topband as it removes the PIA factor from getting a qsl card
credited for DXCC. The extra steps involved for topband and deleted entities to
be checked (send to league hq or wait for a convention with DXCC hq staff
attending) is outdated, inconvenient, and an affront to the
It's easy enough to upload logs and take care of
the Ham on the other end who may not use real QSLs.
Thank you Julius.
I am known as a dinosaur to my friends. I do not readily adopt new
technologies and ways of doing things. But LoTW is my salvation, lest I leave
the hobby altogether. I
I have been reading the responses to my previous post on LOTW and find some of
them curiously interesting. First I am at a point in my life that I wont want
any more clutter. Second and more importantly I have made enough contacts over
the years (46 come september) and sent a lot of cards
The only time $ $ $ $ is a factor is if someone chooses to use a
LOTW verified QSO for award purposes.
$ $ $ $ applies to well known Dollar Bill Collectors and so called
QSL Managers that hold confirmations hostage for cash.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2/17/2012 10:00 AM, Kenneth Grimm wrote:
On 17/02/2012 9:16 AM, Eddy Swynar wrote:
...But what if the ARRL, and others, was to suddenly announce that
they'd no longer issue hard copy certificates---virtual awards only,
viewable on-line...? I wonder if that might cool one's enthusiasm for
ANY paper-chasing. We now have virtual QSL
On 02/17/2012 09:16 AM, Eddy Swynar wrote:
Great! But what if the ARRL, and others, was to suddenly announce that they'd
no longer issue hard copy certificates---virtual awards only, viewable
on-line...? I wonder if that might cool one's enthusiasm for ANY
paper-chasing. We now have
/17/12, Eddy Swynar deswy...@xplornet.ca wrote:
From: Eddy Swynar deswy...@xplornet.ca
Subject: Re: Topband: LOTW Participation
To: Julius Fazekas phriend...@yahoo.com
Cc: Jeff w...@arrl.net, topband@contesting.com
Date: Friday, February 17, 2012, 10:23 AM
On 2012-02-17, at 9:44 AM, Julius
On 2012-02-17, at 11:01 AM, N1BUG wrote:
So by the same token, why would anyone deny the thrill of a LoTW
confirmation to a ham who may not be able to chase confirmations by more
traditional means? It costs nothing to upload to LoTW...
Hi Paul,
And therein lies the rub...!
Imagine if you
It's simple why some don't use LOTH it's called $ $ $ $
What are you possibly talking about? LOTW is FREE for all users. So is
logging software that makes is very easy to use. I use DXKeeper for my
main log, which uploads to LOTW and eQSL at the push of a couple of
buttons. DXKeeper is
It has been asked: Why don't more people use LOTW?
I put it off using LOTW for years because I feared, incorrectly, that it would
be difficult to set up and use. Just last week, I finally got up the nerve to
try it. Much to my pleasant surprise, LOTW was very easy to set up. So,
using
: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
Subject: Re: Topband: LOTW
To: topband@contesting.com
Date: Friday, February 17, 2012, 12:16 PM
It's simple why some don't use LOTH it's called $ $ $ $
What are you possibly talking about? LOTW is FREE for all users. So is
logging software that makes is very
Some of the dxpeditions are allowing u to request a qsl on line with a PayPal
fee as an option of sending thru the mail. Its been very reasonable and
efficient to me when the option is there. I am also still getting lots of buro
qsls that were already confirmed on LOTW.
Sent from my iPhone
Where eQSL has been useful to me is the QSo's I didn't have in my pc log from 5
years ago when I had a paper log. I then see which of those I needed and it
turned out many were in LOTW too and I just needed to add my record for that
QSo's. That enabled me to harvest a dozen or so.
Sent from
As a matter of interest, my confirmed rate on LOTW is around 26% even though I
upload all logged QSOs. I think this method of confirming a QSO is really
great; however, with such a small percentage of hams using LOTW, it is still
necessary to send out paper to obtain cards for awards. This is
I am lucky (?) with a condo antenna and QRP on 160m there is
not much of a demand for my QSL :-(
But interesting to note that I received an LOTW confirmation
for a contact made back in 1982.
jim / W1FMR
___
Hi all,
...really bothering to getting 10-20 messages daily about the LOTW on
the
TB related mailing list. Sorry but I am thinking about unsubscribing
from there
cos the discussion is not devoted to the Topband technically focused
topics.
73 - Petr, OK1RP
that extra mile so we
can get those coveted awards we all like.
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Mills
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:08 PM
To: wa3...@comcast.net ; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: LOTW Participation
Jim.
There are a number of reasons why
I love the LoTW. QSL bureau is in some countries misused to press hams
into forced membership of their national ham radio organization. AFAIK
it is here in OK and also in DL... LoTW is then the only way to confirm
a large number of QSOs.
If somebody has 100 000 QSL cards or more, he would
31 matches
Mail list logo
