Hi All
Mamma Mia ... OK1YQ not the third, but the second !
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20190109-A4.pdf
America.. America.
Nick, UY0ZG
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
This unfortunately lost its purpose... :
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181210-A4.pdf
A couple of years on the first page will be only representatives of the
former socialist countries.
uy0zg писал 2018-12-10 19:16:
Hello Victor!
This is not your topic.
I hope
OK1YQ could be the case or
>> simply a computer error at ARRL Hq.
>> CU on the band
>>
>>
>> >Воскресенье, 18 ноября 2018, 1:15 UTC от Pete N8PR < n...@bellsouth.net >:
>> >
>> >I worked OK1RD in 2011 on 2 Meter EME. Don't k now if he is st
1YQ could be the case or
> simply a computer error at ARRL Hq.
> CU on the band
>
>
> >Воскресенье, 18 ноября 2018, 1:15 UTC от Pete N8PR :
> >
> >I worked OK1RD in 2011 on 2 Meter EME. Don't k now if he is still active
> >73, PeteR N8PR
> >Subject: Topban
ll active
>73, PeteR N8PR
>Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
>
>
>
>ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters -339 OK1YQ .
>
>Who is it ??
>
>http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181116-A4.pdf#page=1=a
>uto,-12,848
>--
>Nick, UY0ZG
>
FWIW,
My 2cents. The continuing threads about DXCC rules bother me. At what
point does a rule need to be changed? Regarding remote receive I suppose
I accept a private remote with say 10km radius. Group or Club rent a RX,
No way! There is no value in anything unless you make an effort
Dear TopBanders,
I think the League's rules have not caught up with the digital age.
Four things have changed since the "analog age":
1. Noise is up
2. 160 meter DXCC (and up) is one of the last remaining HF DX challenges
3. Shared low-noise RX sites have become easy to build and for many may
Bill, Lloyd
You can overcome the audio mute on TX issue with the SDR Radio Console and
Server software from Simon Brown. The Console software syncs with my rig
(TS590S) using Omnirig so can mute the RX audio on TX so you don't hear
your transmitted signal. Some rewiring of the headphone cable
Hi Lloyd,
What you have described is pretty much what I have envisioned.
Personally I am still receiving at my home with occasional QRM from
industrial sources. DSP is easing the problems for me. The problems with
the gee-whiz approaches are centered around "latency". Tap your Morse
key and
[mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Lloyd -
N9LB
Sent: 23 November 2018 22:49
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary
A shared Receive Only site can be used by many operators simultaneously.
However a shared RX-TX
: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary
gotta chip in my $0.02 on this, for what little it may be worth..
i have access to some remote rural property, here in texas, and in
oklahoma..but k5rk and w7rh pointed out 'its not legal for dxcc if an Rx only
site'but
Let's just institute the rules for WAS for DXCC.
Wes N7WS
On 11/23/2018 10:44 AM, Dan Edward Dba East edwards wrote:
gotta chip in my $0.02 on this, for what little it may be worth..
i have access to some remote rural property, here in texas, and in
oklahoma..but k5rk and w7rh pointed out
An additional wrinkle concerning a remote RX site at
a distance within 100 km: I used to have such a
setup. The non obvious advantage of it is that it
allows for FULL DUPLEX operation ON THE SAME FREQUENCY.
This is like QSK on steroids.
Depending on the circumstances, this can be a huge
gotta chip in my $0.02 on this, for what little it may be worth..
i have access to some remote rural property, here in texas, and in
oklahoma..but k5rk and w7rh pointed out 'its not legal for dxcc if an Rx only
site'but RHR is ok ( ? )
the league's requirement that my transmit antenna
Hi Joe,
I would have never assumed that you have acreage whether 5 acres or
something the size of the King Ranch. All of those electrical belches
are difficult to escape. Moving your receiver out into the swamp,
forest, desert, craggy mountaintop or anywhere besides your desktop can
help.
On 2018-11-22 2:08 AM, kol...@rcn.com wrote:
And this is easy to say when you have 5 acres in a semi-rural area, hi hi.
With no antennas. I have not been seriously active on low bands in the
20 years I've been here precisely because of the increasing prevalence
of the multiple remote
Message -
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV"
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:28:45 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary
On 2018-11-21 2:39 PM, Bill Cromwell wrote:
>
> Maintaining a club project &q
On 2018-11-21 2:39 PM, Bill Cromwell wrote:
>
> Maintaining a club project "remote" receiver is something I would
> support with some money and some work. It's a lot more worthwhile than
> yet another two meter FM repeater. I don't really care about using it
> for 160 meter DXCC but I would
Hi Joe,
I live in a small village. Even so, 500 meters isn't going to buy
anything. If we were overwhelmed by noise we would still be overwhelmed
by exactly the same noise. So this is going to be yet another thread
about whose ox is being gored. All those noises don't bother anybody's
:48 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary
> I think a more practical "Station Location and Boundary, would be to have the RX and TX located in either "in the same grid
> square" or "within 100 KM" and of co
I think a more practical "Station Location and Boundary, would be to have the RX and TX located in either "in the same grid
square" or "within 100 KM" and of course within the same DXCC
Entity.
I think 500 meters is more than enough of a "circle" to contain both
transmit and receive
rvice."
-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Lloyd -
N9LB
Sent: 21 November 2018 17:37
To: 'TopBand List'
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters - Station Location and Boundary
I'd like to see the ARRL change part mailto:topband-boun...@cont
I'd like to see the ARRL change part mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim
Thomson
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:57 AM
To: TopBand List
Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:32:20 -0600
From: "Mike Cizek W0VTT"
To: "'J
band: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:32:20
-0600From: "Mike Cizek W0VTT" To: "'Jean-Paul Albert'"
, Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC -
160 Meters<9. Station Location and Boundary:http://www.contesting.com/_topband -
Topband Reflector
__
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:32:20 -0600
From: "Mike Cizek W0VTT"
To: "'Jean-Paul Albert'" ,
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
<9. Station Location and Boundary:
http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
Behalf Of Jean-Paul
> Albert via Topband
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 07:16
> To: n...@n4is.com
> Cc: Greg; topband; w...@w5zn.org
> Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
>
> Hi guys,
>
> What about remote stations (to transmit, to receive or both) for
Cc: Greg; topband; w...@w5zn.org
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
Hi guys,
What about remote stations (to transmit, to receive or both) for any awards
?
Is any recommandations for checkers ?
Best 73
Jean-Paul F6FYA / TM4Q
Envoyé de mon iPad
> Le 20 nov. 2018 à
Hi guys,
What about remote stations (to transmit, to receive or both) for any awards ?
Is any recommandations for checkers ?
Best 73
Jean-Paul F6FYA / TM4Q
Envoyé de mon iPad
> Le 20 nov. 2018 à 18:55, a écrit :
>
> Hi Guys
>
> Here what I think is the problem. DXCC records and link
-Original Message-
From: Topband On Behalf Of Wes Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 2:56 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
One of our SADXA members just wrote a paper about the possibility of daytime
40-meter DX during mid-December
I, and all of Canada.
73
Lloyd - N9LB in snowy and cold Wisconsin.
-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Wes
Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 1:56 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
One of
loyd - N9LB in snowy and cold Wisconsin.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Wes
> Stewart
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 1:56 PM
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
>
&
] On Behalf Of Wes Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 1:56 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
One of our SADXA members just wrote a paper about the possibility of daytime
40-meter DX during mid-December.
But on this subject I would like to know who made
One of our SADXA members just wrote a paper about the possibility of daytime
40-meter DX during mid-December.
But on this subject I would like to know who made the ONE 160-meter SSB QSO with
VP6D.
Wes N7WS
On 11/20/2018 11:57 AM, Clive GM3POI wrote:
JC I think you have to be careful about
ubject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
Hi Guys
Here what I think is the problem. DXCC records and link accounts. This is a
problem with CQ WAZ as well. Here some examples, Back in late 80's a PY1
send 40 cards to claim CQ WAZ 40 zones on 160m, just after HB9AMO Plaque #
1 - 13 June 1987 .
Hi Guys
Here what I think is the problem. DXCC records and link accounts. This is a
problem with CQ WAZ as well. Here some examples, Back in late 80's a PY1
send 40 cards to claim CQ WAZ 40 zones on 160m, just after HB9AMO Plaque #
1 - 13 June 1987 . K1MEM sent a letter to PY1RO to check the
19, 2018 3:21 PM
To: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
I haven't really followed the 160 meter DXCC card checking process closely
since I retired from ARRL elected volunteer service almost 10 years ago and
after my good friend Dave NN1N departed I lost any real inquiry
Good dang deal Jeff.
Sharon has been there in DXCC for a long, long time and she knows the
"skinny".
ZN
On 2018-11-19 17:19, k1zm--- via Topband wrote:
Joel
Quite a few 160m friends have sent emails to Sharon Tarantula - and
she has replied to each of us - saying the matter will be
Joel
Quite a few 160m friends have sent emails to Sharon Tarantula - and she has
replied to each of us - saying the matter will be investigated.
Thanks for your support of this matter.
73 JEFF
In a message dated 11/19/2018 11:24:08 PM Coordinated Universal Time,
w...@w5zn.org writes:
I haven't
I haven't really followed the 160 meter DXCC card checking process
closely since I retired from ARRL elected volunteer service almost 10
years ago and after my good friend Dave NN1N departed I lost any real
inquiry opportunity other than a "regular" member would have ":-))" so I
have no clue
At 08:47 17/11/2018 -0500, you wrote:
(or overworked ARRL staff person at a hamfest).
It was made at Friedrichshafen in 2008 and he was listed in the pdf
file "DXCC Standings". In 2009 he was removed from the file. I have
those files in my archive if needed.
Paolo I4EWH
I worked OK1RD in 2011 on 2 Meter EME. Don't k now if he is still active
73, PeteR N8PR
Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters -339 OK1YQ .
Who is it ??
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181116-A4.pdf#page=1=a
uto,-12,848
--
Nick, UY0ZG
He filed LOTW back in 2009 with callsign of OK1RD
John k9uwa
> >>"There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards. 73
>
> Clive GM3POI"
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
He filed LOTW back in 2009 with callsign of OK1RD
John k9uwa
> >>"There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards. 73
>
> Clive GM3POI"
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
Folks,
Hopefully the ARRL will look into this and
act in a way we all will be satisfied but
they can't act until they have done their
own due diligence. Informing DXCC about it
is the best we can hope to do unless they
do not act on it. I expect they will act
on it when they find the truth
The last LOTW log update for both OK7XX and OK1RD was April 2009.Bob
W4Dr
-Original Message-
From: uy0zg
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 11:09 AM
To: Wes Stewart
Cc: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
Ok my friend.
But in this case all 339
Ok my friend.
But in this case all 339 were presented !
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Wes Stewart писал 2018-11-17 17:18:
I can carry one card to an approved 160 field checker and get it
approved. He has no idea what my total are.
Wes N7WS
On 11/17/2018 7:32 AM, uy0zg wrote:
but he must have an idea if it´s a "possible" contact!
Some months ago, my manager (my Mom) did an error with the time filling a
JA QSL on topband.
This JA asked me for a new QSL with the right time, because the JA checker
rejected this QSL card. That´s great!, hopefully all checkers do the
I can carry one card to an approved 160 field checker and get it approved. He
has no idea what my total are.
Wes N7WS
On 11/17/2018 7:32 AM, uy0zg wrote:
Joe !
To the checker was declared all 339. No doubt !
Nick, UY0ZG
Joe Subich, W4TV писал 2018-11-17 16:22:
The checker does not
>>"There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards. 73
Clive GM3POI"
Thanks Clive. I was under the mistaken impression that ARRL had closed
the previous loopholes in their paper card process but that is clearly not
the case. This (paper cheating on 160 cards) has been
ber 17, 2018 8:12 AM
> To: topband
> Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
>
> Folks - I'm not exactly understanding the LoTW comments on this thread.
> If it is referring to the LoTW screen shot totals listed by OK1RD on his
> website then that is the combined totals in
oun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> n...@n4is.com
> Sent: 17 November 2018 13:29
> To: w...@w5zn.org; 'topband'
> Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
>
> Hi Joel
>
> I have the same impression as Bill mentioned. 160m paper QSL requires a card
> checker, however
Joe !
To the checker was declared all 339. No doubt !
Nick, UY0ZG
Joe Subich, W4TV писал 2018-11-17 16:22:
The checker does not know the total. That number is only in the
DXCC records at ARRL.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2018-11-17 9:09 AM, uy0zg wrote:
How can they (checker ) not pay
Apparently, all he wants to do is hang the award on his shack wall, either
to impress visitors or himself??
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018, 7:47 AM Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>
> ... OK1YQ (OK1RD) has been "cheating" DXCC for decades - primarily with
> fake *cards* presumably
The checker does not know the total. That number is only in the
DXCC records at ARRL.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2018-11-17 9:09 AM, uy0zg wrote:
How can they (checker ) not pay attention to this result ( 339 ! ) ?
Nick, UY0ZG
Joe Subich, W4TV писал 2018-11-17 15:47:
On 2018-11-17 3:46
How can they (checker ) not pay attention to this result ( 339 ! ) ?
Nick, UY0ZG
Joe Subich, W4TV писал 2018-11-17 15:47:
On 2018-11-17 3:46 AM, uy0zg wrote:>
Who makes this list - amateur radio, topbander or robot ...?
The DXCC standings list is generated automatically from the DXCC
seen 160m " QSO's" on Club Log and subsequent
confirmation on LOTW on plain day light.
73's
JC
N4IS
-Original Message-
From: Topband On Behalf Of
w...@w5zn.org
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 8:12 AM
To: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
Folks - I'm n
ive GM3POI
-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
n...@n4is.com
Sent: 17 November 2018 13:29
To: w...@w5zn.org; 'topband'
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
Hi Joel
I have the same impression as Bill mentioned. 160m paper QSL requir
On 2018-11-17 3:46 AM, uy0zg wrote:>
> Who makes this list - amateur radio, topbander or robot ...?
The DXCC standings list is generated automatically from the DXCC
records (not LotW).
OK1YQ (OK1RD) has been "cheating" DXCC for decades - primarily with
fake *cards* presumably approved by a
There have been no uploads for OK1YQ therefore it all has to be cards. 73
Clive GM3POI
-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
n...@n4is.com
Sent: 17 November 2018 13:29
To: w...@w5zn.org; 'topband'
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
's
JC
N4IS
-Original Message-
From: Topband On Behalf Of w...@w5zn.org
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 8:12 AM
To: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
Folks - I'm not exactly understanding the LoTW comments on this thread.
If it is referring to the LoTW screen shot tot
Folks - I'm not exactly understanding the LoTW comments on this thread.
If it is referring to the LoTW screen shot totals listed by OK1RD on his
website then that is the combined totals in his DXCC record, not the
totals confirmed solely via LoTW so a "hack" has not necessarily
occurred.
Bill, all indications are that he got his fake OK1RD 2008 DXCC totals using
paper cards, not LOTW. I would expect he got his fake 2018 totals in a
similar way.
Example fake card, as deconstructed by G3TXF:
http://www.g3txf.com/dxtrip/Fake-C21XF/Fake-C21.html
One thing is for sure, he's
>>Doesn't say much for the DXCC checking process either. 73 Clive GM3POI
Guys this was probably done by OK1RD to embarrass ARRL/DXCC, in retaliation
for ARRL (correctly) removing his bogus listing over 10 years ago. He
probably found a way to hack LOTW and no human monitored the result. I'm
: donov...@starpower.net
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 7:06 PM
To: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
JC,
I have well over a million QSOs in my computer log but not even a
single QSO with OK1YQ
73
Frank
W3LPL
On 2018-11-16 13:32, n...@n4is.com wrote:
I never heard him
: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
hm
Why would anyone with a LEGITIMATE 339 DXCC entities made on 160m made as
licensed station OK1RD submit a DXCC total as CALLSIGN OK1YQ?
That's kind of wacky.isn't it? If it is legit - then congrats!
73 JEFF K1ZM
In a message dated 11/17/2018 12:33
: donov...@starpower.net
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 7:06 PM
To: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
JC,
I have well over a million QSOs in my computer log but not even a
single QSO
with OK1YQ
73
Frank
W3LPL
On 2018-11-16 13:32, n...@n4is.com wrote:
I never heard him
C-2M-20181116-USLetter.pdf
>>
>> 73's JC
>> N4IS
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Topband On Behalf Of uy0zg
>> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 1:41 PM
>> To: Topband@contesting.com
>> Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
>>
&
,
w...@mindspring.com writes:
OK1YQ is actually OK1RD
-Original Message-
From: donov...@starpower.net
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 7:06 PM
To: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
JC,
I have well over a million QSOs in my computer log but not even a single QSO
OK1RD is active on 6m EME.
Paul, K7CW
On Fri, 11/16/18, Tom Haavisto wrote:
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
To: w...@mindspring.com
Cc: "TopBand List" , "Frank Donovan"
Date: Friday, November 16, 2018, 4:58 PM
d but he must be very active on EME
> >
> > ARRL DXCC - 2 Meters -151 OK1YQ
> >
> > http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-2M-20181116-USLetter.pdf
> >
> > 73's JC
> > N4IS
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Topband On
OK1YQ is actually OK1RD
-Original Message-
From: donov...@starpower.net
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 7:06 PM
To: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
JC,
I have well over a million QSOs in my computer log but not even a single QSO
with OK1YQ
73
Frank
W3LPL
-Original Message-
From: Topband On Behalf Of uy0zg
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 1:41 PM
To: Topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters -339 OK1YQ .
Who is it ??
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181116-A4.pdf#page=1=a
uto,-12,848
; From: Topband On Behalf Of uy0zg
>> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 1:41 PM
>> To: Topband@contesting.com
>> Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
>> ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters -339 OK1YQ .
>> Who is it ??
>> http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-201
://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-2M-20181116-USLetter.pdf
>
> 73's JC
> N4IS
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Topband On Behalf Of uy0zg
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 1:41 PM
> To: Topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
&g
-20181116-USLetter.pdf
73's JC
N4IS
-Original Message-
From: Topband On Behalf Of uy0zg
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 1:41 PM
To: Topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters -339 OK1YQ .
Who is it ??
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view
@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters
ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters -339 OK1YQ .
Who is it ??
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181116-A4.pdf#page=1=a
uto,-12,848
--
Nick, UY0ZG
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters -339 OK1YQ .
Who is it ??
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20181116-A4.pdf#page=1=auto,-12,848
--
Nick, UY0ZG
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
77 matches
Mail list logo
