with ground systems there are
no one size fits all rules.
Carl
KM1H
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Waters"
To: "topband"
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: Blessed With Too Many Trees?
This is also the impression that I have.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Mike Waters wrote:
> This is also the impression that I have. I've read countless experiences
> over the years that indicated that trees were no worry on HF. But then this
> thread came along.
>
> I have no other antenna to compare it to, but a tall oak tree support
This is also the impression that I have. I've read countless experiences
over the years that indicated that trees were no worry on HF. But then this
thread came along.
I have no other antenna to compare it to, but a tall oak tree supporting my
160m inverted-L seems to have little (if any) effect o
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> My take on the issue, which seems to agree with what science I've seen
> published on the topic, is that vegetation, including tall trees, has little
> if any effect at HF, but begins to show attenuation in the VHF range that
> becomes increas
On 12/31/2012 8:02 AM, Wayne Willenberg wrote:
The problem I may have is my house is located on about 21/2 acres of
landscaped land that is surrounded by a forest in the remainder of the 5
acres.
Hi Wayne,
My QTH in the Santa Cruz Mountains is in a very dense redwood forest,
and I've tried to
I am very fortunate that my home is located on 5 acres of land in the
country. This make for a very low noise environment.
The problem I may have is my house is located on about 21/2 acres of
landscaped land that is surrounded by a forest in the remainder of the 5
acres. The forest consists of v
