I see a lot of remote receiver and transmitter use, so far its not
being addressed
that I know of.
I got blasted yesterday on the DX clusters because I was spotting A45,
3B9, 3B8,
RA9 etc, LID on the cluster said I was using remote, I suggest the
operator LID
use the call book and see where
Their license was apparently approved and issued by the wrong governmental
department.
73,
Bob AA6VB
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 6, 2016, at 6:42 AM, Johann Bruinier wrote:
>
> Does anyone know the reason(s) for ARRL's withholding the approval for the
> excellent ET7L operation?
>
> A
This is going to be a much bigger issue than the adultered 18M QSLs. :^)
I don't know how easy it is to detect the use of a remote RX, unless a P5
contact at 12 noon local time is claimed. :^))
73 de Vince, VA3VF
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Johann Bruinier
wrote:
>
> Another unpleasant ite
Does anyone know the reason(s) for ARRL's withholding the approval for
the excellent ET7L operation?
Another unpleasant item is the growing use of remote RXs. It's not
difficult to identify the fakers but does ARRL care?
Seasons' Greetings & 73!
Jan DL9KR.
_
Topband Reflecto
