Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2019-04-25 Thread Phil Duff
> On Apr 25, 2019, at 1:24 PM, FZ Bruce wrote: > > If he expires, the FT-8 could go on. A misconception. K1JT's WSJT-X software has a transmit watchdog timer with I believe a 5 minute max limit - can be set lower of course. de NA4M -. .- ….- -- Phil Duff

Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2019-04-25 Thread VE6WZ Steve
> To: topband@contesting.com > Cc: > Sent: Thursday April 25 2019 12:25:31PM > Subject: Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW > > Just a short story for this FT-8 vs CW/SSB discussion. > We, with Helen UR5WA, have been waiting for QSL card from VR2XAN for > 160m QSOs in CQWWCW 2017. > Tw

Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2019-04-25 Thread FZ Bruce
. ( ; > )) 73 Bruce k1fz -From: "Victor Goncharsky via Topband" To: topband@contesting.com Cc: Sent: Thursday April 25 2019 12:25:31PM Subject: Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW Just a short story for this FT-8 vs CW/SSB discussion. We, with Hele

Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2019-04-25 Thread Victor Goncharsky via Topband
Just a short story for this FT-8 vs CW/SSB discussion. We, with Helen UR5WA, have been waiting for QSL card from VR2XAN for 160m QSOs in CQWWCW 2017. Two direct requests both with IRC and $$$ have been sent but no answer. Tried some Italian assistance - same result. So the obvious decision was to

Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2019-04-24 Thread Mike Waters
*In addition to CW contesting*, this might be fun to try sometime for us old men with chronic fatigue, mono, and Lyme. Thank you! 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Wed, Apr 24, 2019, 12:38 PM Joe wrote: > ... > Soon after the "FT8 Roundup" held on December 1-2, 2018, we started serious > work on a

Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2019-04-24 Thread Joe
To: WSJT-X users interested in testing FT4 From: K1JT, K9AN, and G4WJS Soon after the "FT8 Roundup" held on December 1-2, 2018, we started serious work on a faster, more contest-friendly digital mode that can compete with RTTY-contesting QSO rates while preserving many of the benefits of FT8.

Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2019-04-24 Thread Bill Cromwell
Hi Rick, I don't have a memory keyer. I do intend to set up a computer or something to make the calls (CQ) while I do other things near the radios. When somebody replies it will be back to sending by hand for me. I do prefer CW. I am not even sure where a working mic is hidden - I think I

Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2019-04-24 Thread Mike Waters
Someone on 75m this morning said that there was a new FT-4 mode, meant for contesting. I know nothing about it. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2019-04-24 Thread rick darwicki via Topband
So how many of us still send the whole QSO with a key?Buttons on my Pro III do most of the work (like mouse clicks with FT-8), I only send the other station's call (like typing it in with FT-8) I have a friend here in Yorba Linda running 100W to a short vertical that never worked east of the

Re: Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2017-10-25 Thread Renee K6FSB
hi all- i hear a lot of moaning that there is not any cw...well quit moaning and call CQ for a while. do it often. not just listen . someone has to transmit and someone has to listen then answer,. it takes 2 for a QSO. I mean a real QSO more than sig report.like what we did when we

Topband: FT-8 vs CW

2017-10-25 Thread Doug Turnbull
Dear OMs and YLs, I am an engineer thus one who has no right to complain about the advance in technology.This hobby must bring in new approaches if it is to survive.Many would say it is already doomed and they may sadly be right. Now this is not entirely to my liking but