Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-21 Thread Charlie Cunningham
STEWARD Cc: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M And how about the clown last night, around 10pm his local time, when TI9/3Z9DX was working EU, who got on his frequency and said, "NA NA NA, I'm tired and need my sleep." I didn't know whether to l

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-19 Thread Kenneth Grimm
73, Stew K3ND > > From: Steve Flood > To: topband@contesting.com > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 6:25 AM > Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M > > Great points Chet. > > Under the "Be there" category, consider getting up in the middle of

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-19 Thread GALE STEWARD via Topband
19, 2015 6:25 AM Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M Great points Chet. Under the "Be there" category, consider getting up in the middle of the night to work them on the low bands.  Even in the first days of their operation, I got up at 2 a.m. and worked them easily on

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-19 Thread Steve Flood
Great points Chet. Under the "Be there" category, consider getting up in the middle of the night to work them on the low bands. Even in the first days of their operation, I got up at 2 a.m. and worked them easily on 160-80-40 with 100 watts and no pileups. Steve KK7UV --- This email has been

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread chetmoore
riginal Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:44 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M Larry .. don't jump all over me what exatcly was "in my control" of k1n

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread W0MU Mike Fatchett
--Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:12 AM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M im sure i could of too ... i heard them for hours on 80M (3705 +70Khz) some times

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Gary Smith
listen carefully to know which of > those they were doing. They would take some 10-15 up and then take some > around 3815 and then repeat the sequence. > > 73, Larry  W6NWS > -Original Message----- > From: Mike > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:44 PM > To: topba

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Joe Young via Topband
up and then take some around 3815 and then repeat the sequence. 73, Larry  W6NWS -Original Message- From: Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:44 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M Larry .. don't jump all over me what exatcly

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Herbert Schoenbohm
On 2/18/2015 2:56 PM, Larry wrote: I guess i'll upgrade my call ... it is disappointing that location will not be operating again for more than 10+years. This is speculation and depends entirely on who is in charge at the Interior Department-FWL etc. It could happen a lot sooner and depends

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread HAROLD SMITH JR
-15 up and then take some around 3815 and then repeat the sequence. 73, Larry W6NWS -Original Message- From: Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:44 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M Larry .. don't jump all over me what exatc

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Dave Blaschke, w5un
- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:12 AM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M im sure i could of too ... i heard them for hours on 80M (3705 +70Khz) some times even 20 over S9 but

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Larry
-Original Message- From: Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 12:44 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M Larry .. don't jump all over me what exatcly was "in my control" of k1n ? --- sure i could risk a fine by calling on 3775 ...

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Larry Burke
antenna just for this. Not a lot of wire involved if you really wanted to work them. - Larry K5RK -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 11:44 AM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Jim Brown
On Wed,2/18/2015 9:44 AM, Mike wrote: what exatcly was "in my control" of k1n ? --- sure i could risk a fine by calling on 3775 You could upgrade to Extra. 73, Jim K9YC _ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Mike
rom: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:12 AM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M im sure i could of too ... i heard them for hours on 80M (3705 +70Khz) some times even 20 over S9 but n

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Larry Burke
esday, February 18, 2015 10:12 AM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M im sure i could of too ... i heard them for hours on 80M (3705 +70Khz) some times even 20 over S9 but never ventured above 3800 cept once some one got them to go to 60M ... and

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Mike
atriot...@msn.com > To: topband@contesting.com > Subject: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M > > > I have a question .. not top band related ... almost > > but how often did k1n venture into the general portion of the band on > 75m, even on 40m > > I couldn'

Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-18 Thread Mike
I have a question .. not top band related ... almost but how often did k1n venture into the general portion of the band on 75m, even on 40m I couldn't even make a contact on 20M 0UTC and next 2hrs was best according to K6TU propagation corse it would of helped if i had known

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-17 Thread Charlie Cunningham
timezone.com/daylight-map/ -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of jon jones Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 10:45 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M George: Thanks for the note. All the K1N ops did an

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-17 Thread Garry Shapiro
l Message - From: "Garry Shapiro" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 5:51 PM Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M George is spot-on with his comments. I logged K1N from W6 early in the expedition at 0857Z on 3 February for my first QSO with K1N. The absence of

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-17 Thread KL7RA
ebruary 17, 2015 5:51 PM Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M > George is spot-on with his comments. > > I logged K1N from W6 early in the expedition at 0857Z on 3 February for > my first QSO with K1N. The absence of Euros made it a relatively easy QSO. > > Garry, N

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-17 Thread jon jones
George: Thanks for the note. All the K1N ops did an outstanding job ! That is an excellent tip re. getting on after European sunrise and before JA sunset for DXpeditions on the low bands. I got up a number of nights ~ 2 am - 4 am CST to try for K1N. I was successful on 40 and 80 meters wit

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-17 Thread Garry Shapiro
George is spot-on with his comments. I logged K1N from W6 early in the expedition at 0857Z on 3 February for my first QSO with K1N. The absence of Euros made it a relatively easy QSO. Garry, NI6T On 2/17/2015 6:28 PM, GeorgeWallner wrote: Jon, I was one of the 160 m operators. NA callers w

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-17 Thread Jim Brown
On Tue,2/17/2015 6:28 PM, GeorgeWallner wrote: Jon, I was one of the 160 m operators. NA callers were thick during the evening hours when they were competing with EU, making for some difficult pile-ups, but after midnight (and EU sunrise), often there were very few NA callers. That's exactl

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-17 Thread Charlie Cunningham
using the remnant of my 80m GP with only one radial! Great job! Thanks! 73. Charlie, K4OTV -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of GeorgeWallner Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:28 PM To: jon jones; topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topba

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-17 Thread GeorgeWallner
Jon, I was one of the 160 m operators. NA callers were thick during the evening hours when they were competing with EU, making for some difficult pile-ups, but after midnight (and EU sunrise), often there were very few NA callers. George AA7JV On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:57:38 + jon jones

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-17 Thread jon jones
I consider VP6DX to be one of the top all time 160 meter DX operations. Despite being thousands of miles from North America, they worked many small stations including me (at the time had just moved so a random wire thrown over the house and 100 watts). K1N had a great signal on 160, well over

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-16 Thread JC
Cc: TopBand List Subject: Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M Milt, "In this aspect all DXpeditions are equal." Just one comment: Having a large person expedition can yield large differences in 160m Q's compared to a two person expedition. On a two man operation, the ops must dec

Re: Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-16 Thread Ray Benny
Milt, "In this aspect all DXpeditions are equal." Just one comment: Having a large person expedition can yield large differences in 160m Q's compared to a two person expedition. On a two man operation, the ops must decide what band to operate at night, 30, 40, 80 or 160m. They may want to make Q'

Topband: K1N 5,399 q's on 160 M

2015-02-15 Thread Milt -- N5IA
Good evening all. The K1N final numbers are in. I also received some further statistics from Bernd, DF3CB, which slightly change the order of the standings. I received come comments about propagation differences. The following are, IMHO, the relevant factors. DX is DX no matter what band,