gt; action from some antenna.
>
> GL
>
> 73 George W8UVZ
>
> -Original Message- From: Tim Shoppa
> Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 10:32 AM
> To: Art Snapper
> Cc: kd8...@aol.com ; 160
> Subject: Re: Topband: K5P 160m run
>
>
> They had huge signal on
To: Art Snapper
Cc: kd8...@aol.com ; 160
Subject: Re: Topband: K5P 160m run
They had huge signal on 160M here in W3 last night.
On 80M... my unconfirmed suspicion is that they have one ?Battle Creek
Special? and maybe one ?lowband receive system?, and cannot activate both
160M and 80M simultaneousl
They had huge signal on 160M here in W3 last night.
On 80M... my unconfirmed suspicion is that they have one ?Battle Creek
Special? and maybe one ?lowband receive system?, and cannot activate both
160M and 80M simultaneously with the good stuff.
Right now the stats in clublog say they 120 in zone
I was surprised how much stronger they are here on TB than on 80.
Art NK8X
ᐧ
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Mike via Topband
wrote:
> What a run K5P has had on 160 the last 2 nights! I run an inverted L with
> the vertical portion up 65" and 90 radials of which 60 are 120'. It's not
> a
What a run K5P has had on 160 the last 2 nights! I run an inverted L with
the vertical portion up 65" and 90 radials of which 60 are 120'. It's not
a bad Tx ant, but not so hot on Rx, and I need a bit better Wx to put up
the Hi-Z array I bought. I usually hear stations in the pacific for 3