On 4/23/2011 5:30 PM, ZR wrote:
>> On 4/23/2011 7:04 AM, ZR wrote:
>>> The linear loaded KLM 40 and 80M yagis never lived up to their hype. OTOH
>>> the little Cushcraft 2el 40 with loading coils plus a capacity hat way
>>> out
>>> on the elements is a proven winner.
>>>
>>> Ive sold one of my 40M
- Original Message -
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist"
To: "ZR"
Cc: "Bill and Liz McHugh" ;
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: LINEAR vs TOP LOADING
>
>
> On 4/23/2011 7:04 AM, ZR wrote:
>> The linear loaded KLM
On 4/23/2011 7:04 AM, ZR wrote:
> The linear loaded KLM 40 and 80M yagis never lived up to their hype. OTOH
> the little Cushcraft 2el 40 with loading coils plus a capacity hat way out
> on the elements is a proven winner.
>
> Ive sold one of my 40M 4el KLM's and made a pair of CC style 2el from
KM1H
- Original Message -
From: "Bill and Liz McHugh"
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 8:02 AM
Subject: Topband: LINEAR vs TOP LOADING
> My first 160M vertical was linear-loaded and it worked fineor so I
> thought. The late K6SE did an EZNEC analysis of my antenna vs what I a
My first 160M vertical was linear-loaded and it worked fineor so I thought.
The late K6SE did an EZNEC analysis of my antenna vs what I am using now,
which is an 80 ft top-loaded (three wires) and his analysis showed a
considerable improvement in efficiency moving to the top-load. I have a
