I thought I read the rules for the ARRL 160
> >> and saw where US possessions can work US VE and DX?
> >>
> >> 73, Mark K0KX
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "Herbert Schoenbohm"
> >> To: k...@optimum.net
> >>
nbohm"
To: k...@optimum.net
Cc: "TopBand List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 1:41:08 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: Polarization on 160m
So is the 70-year-old Collins 74A4 with its mechanic filters and single
conversion method. Many times you could just roll the IX into a deep ho
the rules for the ARRL 160
> and saw where US possessions can work US VE and DX?
>
> 73, Mark K0KX
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Herbert Schoenbohm"
> To: k...@optimum.net
> Cc: "TopBand List"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 1:41:08 PM
>
28, 2018 1:41:08 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: Polarization on 160m
So is the 70-year-old Collins 74A4 with its mechanic filters and single
conversion method. Many times you could just roll the IX into a deep hole
with the bandpass control and the signal would pop out of nowhere. Wish I
still had mine to
; Not knowing about "gyros", but when operating and having vertical and
> >> horizontal antennas available, I remember times when QSB was
> >> happening
> >> on one antenna, switching to the "other" polarization antenna would
> >> bring the signals
it. 73 to all. . . Dave, W0FLS
-Original Message- From: Yuri Blanarovich
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 11:13 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Polarization on 160m
Speaking of "two ears"
Going back to using two Drake R4B receivers, two antennas, o
-Original Message- From: Yuri Blanarovich
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 11:13 AM
> To: topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: Polarization on 160m
>
>
> Speaking of "two ears"
> Going back to using two Drake R4B receivers, two antennas, one on ea
: Topband: Polarization on 160m
Speaking of "two ears"
Going back to using two Drake R4B receivers, two antennas, one on each
ear, there would be times when "two ears" heard the signal, while
switching to each other there would be nil. I think that was some DSP
going on in the
2018 at 09:22 AM, Robert Parkes via Topband wrote:
Polarization on 160m
Interesting discussion and one I suspect we wish could fully
comprehend !
When the wave front meets the ionosphere and the wave splits the
critical frequency is different for the two waves, commonly known as
foc and
t; rolling around, especially when far DX.
>
> Yuri, K3BU, VE3BMV, VE1BY
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:22 AM, Robert Parkes via Topband wrote:
>
> >
> > Polarization on 160m
> >
> > Interesting discussion and one I suspect we wish could fully
>
ignal's polarization was
rolling around, especially when far DX.
Yuri, K3BU, VE3BMV, VE1BY
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:22 AM, Robert Parkes via Topband wrote:
>
Polarization on 160m
Interesting discussion and one I suspect we wish could fully
comprehend !
When the wave fro
Polarization on 160m
Interesting discussion and one I suspect we wish could fully comprehend !
When the wave front meets the ionosphere and the wave splits the
critical frequency is different for the two waves, commonly known as foc and
fxc.
This difference (from memory) is half the
12 matches
Mail list logo
