One more vote for the HiZ.
I have the four element since 2012. It's NOT a perfect installation at my
QTH...trees all around, not that far from the fence. I'm in central NC, clay
soil, with 50 kV power lines about 1/8 mile away to north. But it works, and
works well even with my compromised
quite well. It has the added benefit that you don't use ground
> radials at each vertical, just a ground rod for each antenna.
>
> Tim, K9CQ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lee STRAHAN
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 4:05 PM
> To: terry burge ; topband@contesti
ay, July 30, 2019 4:05 PM
> To: terry burge ; topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: RX antennas comparison chart
>
> I have another comparison chart here on the Hi-Z Antennas website. It
> has a little more information.
> https://www.hizantennas.com/receiving_antennacomp
st a ground rod for each antenna.
Tim, K9CQ
-Original Message-
From: Lee STRAHAN
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 4:05 PM
To: terry burge ; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: RX antennas comparison chart
I have another comparison chart here on the Hi-Z Antennas website. It has
AM
To: topband@contesting.com; terry burge
Subject: Topband: RX antennas comparison chart
Thanks to Bob, N4PQX I got this link to an active chart comparing RX antennas.
Thanks to K7TJR this might prove very helpful to anyone thinking about
investing in a receive antenna. Also has some active
Thanks to Bob, N4PQX I got this link to an active chart comparing RX antennas.
Thanks to K7TJR this might prove very helpful to anyone thinking about
investing in a receive antenna. Also has some active plots for the various
antennas. Terry, KI7M
https://www.k7tjr.com/rx1comparison.htm
_
