Re: Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m

are also fun. And fun is where YOU find it. 73, Kevin K3OX - Original Message - From: k1zm--- via Topband To: wes n7ws , topband@contesting.com Sent: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 12:30:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m Whoa! That matrix of Clublog contacts

Re: Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m

Hello This data is not representative of mode´s use people not use to spot FT8, why to do that? Is just one frequency, no need to S 73, Jorge Libre de virus. www.avast.com

Re: Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m

Topband To: wes n7ws , topband@contesting.com Sent: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 12:30:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m Whoa! That matrix of Clublog contacts made by mode really does make it pretty clear to me. Probably the best thing we can all do to deal

Re: Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m

Whoa! That matrix of Clublog contacts made by mode really does make it pretty clear to me. Probably the best thing we can all do to deal with this is to get on CW and SSB as often as we may desire to - to keep the traditional modes alive in the traditional band segments. Tks Wes for adding to

Re: Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m

Perhaps more informative, read it and weep:  https://clublog.org/dxreport.html Wes  N7WS On 8/3/2019 8:34 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote: Of the last 1000 spots downloaded from DX Summit  just over 200 of them at on FT8.  Which means that nearly 800 spots were NOT FT8 meaning those were CW or

Topband: Review of the last 1000 spots on 160m

Of the last 1000 spots downloaded from DX Summit  just over 200 of them at on FT8.  Which means that nearly 800 spots were NOT FT8 meaning those were CW or SSB spots.  Not all of the spots are actually spots as many spots are just people venting and using the system as their message system.