It turns out that there have been two cycles back to back with what we
would consider bad numbers. They started in 1800 and it lasted three
cycles. It's called the Dalton minimum.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalton_Minimum
On 6/5/2016 2:50 PM, Kevin Stover wrote:
If I read the reference
that Cycle 24 will be
looked at as the beginning of a new Maunder Minimum.
Thanks
73
Frank
W3LPL
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Stover" <kevin.sto...@mediacombb.net>
To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2016 3:40:53 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: VANISHIN
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 11:40 53AM, Kevin Stover
> wrote:
>
> I think Cycle 24 will be looked at as the beginning of a new Maunder Minimum.
> If so then Cycle 24 will be as good as it gets for the next 70 years on the
> high bands.
That’s not all bad. It gives me
Thanks Bill.
I think Cycle 24 will be looked at as the beginning of a new Maunder
Minimum.
If so then Cycle 24 will be as good as it gets for the next 70 years on
the high bands.
On 6/5/2016 10:05 AM, Jeff Kinzli N6GQ wrote:
Bill, good reads, thank you.
It seems that the consensus is that
Bill, good reads, thank you.
It seems that the consensus is that cycle 25 will be less active than
cycle 24, with some projections putting it at the lowest in many
cycles. I think the theory is that the speed of the conveyor belt is
an indicator the vigor of the coming cycle.
Do we have any
Something interesting is happening on the sun. Yesterday, June 3rd, the
sunspot number dropped to 0, and the solar disk is still blank on June 5th.
Latest images from NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory reveal no significant
dark cores.
What does this mean? The solar cycle is like a pendulum,