Re: Topband: binocular matching transformers - Solved

2013-03-27 Thread HAROLD SMITH JR
From: Pete Smith N4ZR n...@contesting.com To: Topband@contesting.com Sent: Tue, March 26, 2013 9:41:23 AM Subject: Re: Topband: binocular matching transformers - Solved Thanks to everyone who helped me straighten this out. Changing from 2:4 to 4:8 turns

Re: Topband: binocular matching transformers - Solved

2013-03-27 Thread Sudipta Ghose
Hi! Thanks! I hope this will solve my problem also. Kind regards, 73 SG/VU3TKG On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR n...@contesting.comwrote: Thanks to everyone who helped me straighten this out. Changing from 2:4 to 4:8 turns made all the difference, probably, as a couple of

Re: Topband: binocular matching transformers - Solved

2013-03-26 Thread Pete Smith N4ZR
Thanks to everyone who helped me straighten this out. Changing from 2:4 to 4:8 turns made all the difference, probably, as a couple of people suggested, because only two turns ion the primary is inadequate. Anyhow, everything now behaves as expected, so it's time (as soon as the snow melts)

Re: Topband: binocular matching transformers

2013-03-25 Thread Mike Waters
Pete, You're correct on the turns ratio: the impedance ratio is the square of the turns ratio. I'm wondering whether you are considering that one turn on a binocular core is actually one pass through both holes. There's a photo clearly showing this at

Topband: binocular matching transformers

2013-03-24 Thread Pete Smith N4ZR
Please have mercy on a history major... I'm trying to wind a binoocular core matching transformer for 75-ohm coax to a BOG with (for a start) 270 ohms of terminating resistance. I figure that is a 4:1 stepdown, which should require a turns ratio of 2:1. Initially I wound a #73 core with