Hi folks
Unfortunately, there are more and more collectors on this list than
lovers of 160m.
http://www.arrl.org/system/dxcc/view/DXCC-160M-20230109-USLetter.pdf
I, for example, am interested in another (live) process - the indicators
of daily work with DX.
For example, today I have CFM
You all missed my point.
QSL's confirmed solely LoTW aren't checked by any person. For example,
MM0ZBH QSO with WB6CTL is now QSL'd in LoTW for DXCC purposes as a 160
meter QSO at 2130Z.
73,
Steve, N2IC
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 4:27 PM Jim Kinney wrote:
> I got some checked at our local
I got some checked at our local hamfest. It takes about 3-4 weeks for them to
show up LoTW.
73, Jim WE4S
Get BlueMail for Android
On Jan 9, 2023, 4:31 PM, at 4:31 PM, Jim Brown
wrote:
>On 1/9/2023 9:47 AM, Steve London wrote:
>> What kind of card checking is done for LoTW confirmations
On 1/9/2023 9:47 AM, Steve London wrote:
What kind of card checking is done for LoTW confirmations ?
There are, unfortunately, some inconsiderate hams who won't use LOTW.
Thankfully, fewer as time goes by. When we were kids, the "final
courtesy of a QSO" was a QSL, and postage was 2-3 cents.
What size a rhombic would be "large" on 160 m?
Perhaps long enough for far end to be close to the other station.
73,
George
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:07:53 -0700 Steve London wrote:
Did he say which ocean ?
Sorry, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
73,
Steve, N2IC
On Mon,
What kind of card checking is done for LoTW confirmations ?
73,
Steve, N2IC
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 10:43 AM Jim Brown wrote:
> On 1/9/2023 6:48 AM, STEVE MCDONALD wrote:
> > Highly unlikely at 1:30 in the afternoon in California.
>
> All of this is an example of why ARRL card checkers must
On 1/9/2023 6:48 AM, STEVE MCDONALD wrote:
Highly unlikely at 1:30 in the afternoon in California.
All of this is an example of why ARRL card checkers must have achieved
DXCC on topband before they can check topband cards.
73, Jim K9YC
_
Searchable Archives:
I used to live near Granada Hills - not near an ocean.
I guess he could have a remote station somewhere - but again, 1:30 PM in
SoCal is a no go. I can't imagine where someone would have a big rhombic
near an ocean in SoCal with much of an advantage towards Europe.
Reminds me of a story - back
Highly unlikely at 1:30 in the afternoon in California.
> 160m on 24Nov22 @ 2130Z
>
> I emailed to ask if he was transmitting from CA per his QRZ.com details and
> he confirmed that was correct and he was using a large rhombic by the
> ocean. Both contacts are confirmed in LoTw as California.
Did he say which ocean ?
Sorry, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
73,
Steve, N2IC
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 4:34 AM Paul Mcl wrote:
> I recently worked WB6CJT twice on CW:
>
> 160m on 24Nov22 @ 2130Z
> 80m on 7Dec/22 @ 2215Z
>
> I emailed to ask if he was transmitting from CA
I recently worked WB6CJT twice on CW:
160m on 24Nov22 @ 2130Z
80m on 7Dec/22 @ 2215Z
I emailed to ask if he was transmitting from CA per his QRZ.com details and
he confirmed that was correct and he was using a large rhombic by the
ocean. Both contacts are confirmed in LoTw as California.
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
Interesting spot..? 2324Z 1.832.Ø TN8K DL3DXX wkd
NM6V,W6AEA,WB6CJT big remo Republic of the Congo (TN)
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
Worked fairly easily.
--
Mike W0MU
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
On 2/21/2015 9:40 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
Worked fairly easily.
Worked them with one call, only running 200
watts. Out of 10 band slots, this one was
the easiest. Just like with K1N. Can
a threepeat be possible with PQ0T?
This has been another great DXPedition.
Also worked 6Y2T and
15 matches
Mail list logo
