Thanks for the support.
--tk
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Scott Henninger
wrote:
> not necessary.>
>
> Yes.
>
> Program Files and we are done?>
>
> Yes. It can be placed in any directory. Composer/Eclipse do not use
> the Windows registry.
>
> -
Just to be clear, your saying that the .msi type of installation is
not necessary.
Your saying that the unzip'ed folder 'tbcme' is just placed in the
Program Files and we are done?
--tk
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Scott Henninger
wrote:
> Only one of these steps is nee
nents
within Eclipse but not a part of TBC-ME proper?
--tk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to topbraid-composer-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send ema
As always, great information.
many thanks Jeremy.
--tk
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
> Hi TK
>
> TopBraid Composer all versions is supported on Windows 7.
> This means that we will help you with any Windows 7 specific bugs.
>
> One TopQuadrant em
Has any testing been done on TBC-ME on Windows 7 (64bit)?
Gotta move to a new machine and I'm checking all my important
applications.
--tk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To post to this group, send em
le so I thought I should say something.
Great job and people do buy based on quality support.
-- tk
On Jun 18, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Scott Henninger
wrote:
>
> It is not necessary to uninstall a version of Composer when installing
> a new one. If you specify a different installation d
Hello,
quick question: When going from SE to ME on a Windows platform like
Vista-32bit, is the recommended method to do a complete uninstall of
SE and then install ME?
--tk
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
done doap.owl? gut says yes)
If this process is correct, then it would appear that I need to follow
a similar modification process like Holger did for foaf.owl
I have another related question but I will ask it in another thread.
--tk
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You r
this { } symbol. You can hack it in via the Source Code but
that is cheating. :-)
The new owl:oneOf represntation will not yield the orange ball with the { }
symbolizing the enumeration.
Instead, there is a planet symbol similar to the one used for the Imports
View tab.
--tk
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009
{ } symbol is not being displayed
which I am sure is related to the fact that it is not in the
owl:equivalentClass
--tk
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To p
Thanks again for a very timely response.
--tk
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Scott Henninger <
shennin...@topquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> TK; This is a timely question that probably brings up a range of
> answers. First is that the guide you refer to is still a valid guide
>
Is there a more recent Getting Started Guide? The one I found is
version 2.0 dated Jul-21 2007
I'm looking for any documentation specific to TopBraid Composer.
Thanks in advance,
--tk
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscrib
:type
rdfs:subClassOf
rdfs:subPropertyOf
rdfs:domain
rdfs:range
owl:inverseOf
owl:TransitiveProperty
owl:SameAs
owl:hasValue
Thanks in advance,
--tk
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Comp
he lines of the
Allemang/Hendler 'Working Ontologist' book. It would be host to
discussions around effective modeling in different domains. Given the
relationship between this list and Dean Allemang that I thought I
would begin my quest here. :-)
Jeremy, thanks for the education.
If there is a more appropriate forum for this discussion, please direct me.
--tk
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
>
> I'll let Scott or Holger answer about how best to use this URI in TBC, but
> I'll comment on the
e
with TBC users? I guessing that there is no other choice but to %-
escape.
Thanks,
--tk
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To post to this group, send em
going to pan out.
I remain a fan of your product and your support.
--tk
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>
> Hi tk,
>
> If you remove TBC and develop an application directly against an RDF store,
> then you your best bet is to contact the RDF store vendors t
BC/AllegroGraph
combination, what are my choices regarding reasoners when I remove TBC
and look to develop an application around that ontological backend
store?
If my question is not making sense, I'll take another shot at it.
Thanks in advanced,
--tk
--~--~-~--~~~
book
says: it 'extends' - as in it extends the owl inferencing.
The book's example has a functional objective to 'streamline' the
declaration of an 'inverseOf' that is two-way; that is exactly what it
does. Thanks for helping me with this understanding.
Regards,
nner, it would be change at a global level.
--tk
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Scott Henninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> Hello; There is a problem with your triple in that owl:inverseOf is a
> property and is used as the subject in "owl:inverseOf rdf:type
> owl:Symmet
.
--tk
--
"The nervous system organizes itself so as to compute a stable reality" -
Maturana & Varela
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To
21 matches
Mail list logo
