Andriy,
The errors shows that there is a problem downloading
"org.topbraidlive.dropins,3.5.0.v20110530-0330R". Does this error happen
when trying to get TBC plugins from the update site or does Eclipse
attempt to get TBC plugins from the update site when installing your
plugins?
Gokhan
On
Hi Gerrit,
I may need more information to understand this issue. I tried the following and
got no error. I changed the KennedysInferencingAndConstraintsExample so that it
also loads the SMF function file
// Create OntModel with imports
OntModel on
Yes I just committed a fix. I hate to point fingers, but in this case it was a
minor bug in ARQ that became quite dramatically visible here. My fix is a small
modification to ARQ 2.8.7 (in the class PathWriter), so if you plan to use this
fix on the SPIN API, you would also need to get the same
On Jun 10, 2011, at 7:54 AM, Scott Henninger wrote:
> Also make sure you are using 3.5.0.v20110530-0330R.
Yes, the interactive Manchester Syntax in SWP was introduced a few days before
the final release, so the beta doesn't have it. This was the source of
confusion because your screenshots look
Try the "Open page in external browser" page in the Browser tab. It
may just be a browser issue.
Also make sure you are using 3.5.0.v20110530-0330R.
-- Scott
On Jun 8, 1:10 am, "Bohms, H.M. (Michel)" wrote:
> sorry but I cant get it to work
> what I did:
>
> - created new workspace from tbc (v
Thanks, that was exactly the problem! Not enough RAM assigned to the
virtual machine. Thanks, Cheers, Tony.
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:12:19 +0100, Scott Henninger
wrote:
Anthony, I believe the problem is that you don't have enough
contiguous memory available to start Composer. Sometimes r
Hi Im still learning as fast as I can but only seem to be a fraction up the
mountain with the semantic web, still I am far further on than I was when I
asked my first question lol, but Im back again to ask your learned advice on
how best to model a table consisting of rows, columns and grouped h
Yes, this is a really nice feature of SPIN. As opposed to being
limited to checking consistency of the model, any data constraint can
be expressed. Given that, the data constraints are valid before or
after applying rules, inference, etc. Another advantage of this
approach is that there isn't a
Hello Gerrit; When creating a property, the wizard displays
owl:IrreflexiveProperty as a subproperty of owl:ObjectProperty. Or,
for an existing property, you can choose the menu on the far right-
hand side of the text box for the property's type. The same wizard
for creating a property appears an
Michel, if you use the 3.5 release, this will work. Download at
http://www.topquadrant.com/products/TB_install.php
-- Scott
On Jun 9, 5:34 am, "Bohms, H.M. (Michel)" wrote:
> Hi Holger/Scott,
>
> On this minimal example I see in my version no link in the browser (after
> refresh here) for the
Jeff, we're confirming this as well and will get this fixed for 3.5.1.
-- Scott
On Jun 9, 8:45 am, "Schmitz, Jeffrey A"
wrote:
> Hello,
> When I write the following SPARQL as a sml:constructQuery in the
> SPARQLMotion ApplyConstruct Form:
>
> ?oneOfEnum rdf:rest*/rdf:first/rdfs:label ?en
Hello,
When I write the following SPARQL as a sml:constructQuery in the
SPARQLMotion ApplyConstruct Form:
?oneOfEnum rdf:rest*/rdf:first/rdfs:label ?enumName .
the formatter changes it to:
?oneOfEnum (((rdf:rest)*/rdf:first)/rdfs:label ?enumName .
which has an extra parentheses on t
When performing constraint checking using
// Run all constraints
List cvs = SPINConstraints.check(model,
null);
System.out.println("Constraint violations:");
for(ConstraintViolation cv : cvs) {
System.out.print
Hmm.. I think my question should rather be: When property chains are
inferred, why are constraint violations not prevented? E.g. if I have
an irreflexive property with a property chain, the property chain is
still inferred, and just a violation warning is displayed.
On Jun 9, 10:14 am, Gerrit wro
I think I just found the solution to the first question: Clicking on
the arrow next to rdf:type and selecting "Add existing..."
On Jun 9, 10:10 am, Gerrit wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> If I want to define a property as irreflexive, do I have to click on
> the arrow next to rdf:type, click "Add empt
Two questions:
If I want to define a property as irreflexive, do I have to click on
the arrow next to rdf:type, click "Add empty row" and then enter
"owl:IrreflexiveProperty" manually, or is there a faster way of doing
this? I see other options like owl:SymmetricProperty is available
there.
If I
16 matches
Mail list logo
