Hi Jack,
sorry but I believe we will need to get hands on your example file to
help you further. Off-list is fine.
Holger
On 7/25/2014 5:20, Jack Hodges wrote:
Hello Irene,
I checked all of the classes and they are all rdf:type owl:Class (they
subclass owl:Thing). I checked all of the pro
Hello Irene,
I checked all of the classes and they are all rdf:type owl:Class (they
subclass owl:Thing). I checked all of the properties I am using as facets
and the items in all of their domains and ranges are rdf:type owl:Class.
But no faceted search (I closed and opened the model and refresh
Thanks!
On Thursday, July 24, 2014 8:28:41 AM UTC-7, Irene Polikoff wrote:
>
> Jack,
>
>
>
> I don’t believe sub-classing is either an issue or a requirement here.
> Faceted search works over instances of a class. Classes are instances of
> either rdfs:Class or owl:Class. So, you need to be f
Jack,
I don’t believe sub-classing is either an issue or a requirement here. Faceted
search works over instances of a class. Classes are instances of either
rdfs:Class or owl:Class. So, you need to be faceting over either rdfs:Class or
owl:Class. And properties to select from as facets woul
I am trying to build faceted search across standard models/repositories. In
this case the classes are terminals for the repository and contain all the
information an instance would carry. For example, in the obolibrary DOID,
disease obo:DOID_9352 is fully populated with content, and the disease
