With the freedom of using a text editor, comes a responsibility of ensuring
that what you "freely typed" makes sense. Not everyone is ready to accept it :)
In general, I find it surprising how many people do not appreciate that data
models are like programs - they need to be verified, tested, e
The sh:targetNode should be dcat:Dataset (without quotes - now it's a
string)
HTH
Holger
On 26/03/2018 22:01, Paul Hermans wrote:
I'm using the DCAT-AP SHACL constraints from the EC.
They contain:
|
:MandatoryDataset
rdf:type sh:NodeShape;
rdfs:comment "Mandatory dataset ";
rdfs:label
We're not using any of that, either.
On Sunday, March 25, 2018 at 3:52:49 PM UTC-7, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
> Dear TopBraid users,
>
> while reviewing our current set of features, I noticed that we have
> supported importing of RDFa and Microdata as well as converting Atom and
> RSS newsfeeds
not with us.
On Sunday, March 25, 2018 at 3:52:49 PM UTC-7, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
> Dear TopBraid users,
>
> while reviewing our current set of features, I noticed that we have
> supported importing of RDFa and Microdata as well as converting Atom and
> RSS newsfeeds to RDF for many years.
I'm using the DCAT-AP SHACL constraints from the EC.
They contain:
:MandatoryDataset
rdf:type sh:NodeShape ;
rdfs:comment "Mandatory dataset " ;
rdfs:label "Mandatory dataset" ;
sh:property [
sh:minCount 1 ;
sh:path [
sh:inversePath rdf:type ;
] ;
] ;
sh
