Re: [topbraid-users] Java 805306369 startup error

2019-03-06 Thread Holger Knublauch
Maybe this helps? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10157794/java-was-started-but-returned-exit-code-805306369 Holger On 7/03/2019 12:35 am, Sam Gralnick wrote: What's the fix? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To

RE: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?

2019-03-06 Thread 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
Hi David Many thx for your extensive advice! Great. I see you point in having the state at the object having the properties... Beside property modelling, we also address product modelling in LBD. But those do not have state there yet (https://github.com/w3c-lbd-cg/product/blob/master/prod.ttl

Re: [topbraid-users] TBC-EDG connecting to external tripestore

2019-03-06 Thread Irene Polikoff
Michel, Are you asking about TBC or about EDG? Both are full featured systems for working with (editing, checking, reasoning, transforming) RDF data as opposed to viewers for remote triple stores. When you configure EDG you need to specify a triple store repository for the information in EDG.

[topbraid-users] Java 805306369 startup error

2019-03-06 Thread Sam Gralnick
What's the fix? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit

[topbraid-users] TBC-EDG connecting to external tripestore

2019-03-06 Thread Michel Héon
Hi I would like to use TBC-EDG as a web base ontology editor for my ontologist and I would like to know if it is possible to connect TBC-EDG to an external triplestore for browsing a remote graph from TBC-EDG Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?

2019-03-06 Thread dprice
> On 6 Mar 2019, at 12:32, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users > wrote: > > Hi David, > > Thx and fully agree the wkt-issue! > > In att. I actually propose to be more explicit as alternative like > hasQuantity, hasUnit, hasQuantitativeValue etc. (sheet 24). > > The example

Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?

2019-03-06 Thread dprice
Hi Michel, Just remembered that the ISO 15926-12 ontology is available online, in case you would like to compare that with the OPM. https://standards.iso.org/iso/ts/15926/-12/ed-1/en/tech/ontology/ Note that there’s an