RE: [topbraid-users] from property to constraint

Wrt “strings to things” > fully agree, so the “quantityKind as datatype” is only relevant in the case > that the quantity is modelled the simplest wat (OPM L1) that is “as > owl:DatatypeProperty”. (other then going beyond DL putting the quantityKind > at the property declaration. Ps Over Su

RE: [topbraid-users] from property to constraint

Agreed. WKT strings in general need extra agreements on the string structure ie how to parse. Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E michel.bo...@tno.nl Location

RE: [topbraid-users] from property to constraint

Thx for the update Ralph, see after > “Dereferencing at the graph level is underway.” > That is exactly the feedback for years now. Do you have some point in time? QUDT is now very active again - take a look at the latest catalog which can be reached at www.qudt.org > Th

Re: [topbraid-users] from property to constraint

I don’t believe that storing quantity kind with the measurements is required in any of the 3 options. With every option, including option 1, you are defining a resource :Height that is used when capturing measurements. And with every option, quantity kind is already associated with the :Height.