Oops, yes. I need to record this for the errata. This is a W3C doc that
I cannot simply change. Thankfully it is just an informal example.
Holger
On 28/07/2021 5:46 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
wrote:
Wrt to following fragment in https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/
No.
Holger
On 28/07/2021 5:24 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
wrote:
Thx Holger
So there is no implicit variant here without a target?
Like:
ex:*hasUnit*
a sh:NodeShape ;
sh:class qudt:Unit .
(where ex:hasUnit is also an rdfs:Property somewhere
Wrt to following fragment in https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/ (or later:
https://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/)
* At most 5 values of ex:property?
* Shouldn't that be ex:digit?
The following example illustrates the use of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint to
express that a hand must have
Thx Holger
So there is no implicit variant here without a target?
Like:
ex:hasUnit
a sh:NodeShape ;
sh:class qudt:Unit .
(where ex:hasUnit is also an rdfs:Property somewhere else/imported).
To establish a global range-like property constraint, you could do
ex:hasUnitShape
a
