Re: [topbraid-users] Materialized inferred values in GraphQL queries

2024-02-05 Thread Michael Panzer
values rules (temporarily) and run the same > queries, comparing the execution time? > If you assert them anyway, would it make sense for you to have these > sh:values rules disabled for the runtime system? > > Holger > > > On 5 Feb 2024, at 5:08 pm, Michael Panzer wrote: >

[topbraid-users] Materialized inferred values in GraphQL queries

2024-02-05 Thread Michael Panzer
Hi, does anybody know if, given a sh:values rule that is materialized, the GraphQL engine still does on-the-fly inferencing of values (even though the triples are in the graph)? My hunch is that it does. We are seeing very slow performance from GraphQL queries and trying to narrow down if this

Re: [topbraid-users] Using URI schemes other than urn and http as an identifier

2023-11-17 Thread Michael Panzer
at if we allow arbitrary URI schemes, as the system would then > basically allow any prefixed name even if no prefix is declared. The only > solution I could think of would be for us to add a configuration option to > enumerate the other URI schemes. Do you have a better idea? > > Hol

[topbraid-users] Using URI schemes other than urn and http as an identifier

2023-11-15 Thread Michael Panzer
Hi, I am currently trying to use DIDs (https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/) as identifiers for instances in TopBraid. Example: The interface complains because it interprets the did: as a prefix instead of an URI scheme. I assume the same would happen with other URI schemes like ark:, etc. We