Re: [topbraid-users] [SPIN] Overriding spl:Arguments in subclasses

2016-08-29 Thread Martynas Jusevicius
Thanks Holger. I think a solution could be to have 2 sets of arguments: template-local (by default), and inheritable (defined so explicitly), or "tunneled". Subclasses would not see the local arguments of superclasses, and it would be an error to redefine tunneled arguments with a different

Re: [topbraid-users] [SPIN] Overriding spl:Arguments in subclasses

2016-08-28 Thread Holger Knublauch
Hi Martynas, as you have found out, this scenario is not supported by SPIN. Multiple declarations of the same predicate lead to undefined behavior. I am not particularly keen to touch this area of code, because it is so widely used and I don't want to risk regression bugs or performance

[topbraid-users] [SPIN] Overriding spl:Arguments in subclasses

2016-08-28 Thread Martynas Jusevicius
Hey, I have a somewhat artificial use case where both a class and its superclass each have an spl:Argument with the same predicate, but different spl:defaultValue, and possibly other properties: :Template a spin:Template ; spin:constraint [ a spl:Argument ;