Re: [topbraid-users] All rules that determine whether something will have a function factory - where?

2019-07-18 Thread Holger Knublauch
Hmm, it's hard to diagnose this problem without seeing the actual files. And it is hard for the tool to show a list of functions that do *not* work, because it cannot anticipate what you're trying to call. As a final random guess, maybe there are conflicting namespace prefixes assigned to diff

Re: [topbraid-users] All rules that determine whether something will have a function factory - where?

2019-07-18 Thread Jack Hodges
This happens before and after a refresh of system registries (always my first check). This is with TBCME version 6.2.2. I would actually like to see the problem with any SPIN function or template flagged in the interface. Right now I don't find out until I try to execute it in a SPARQL tab from

Re: [topbraid-users] All rules that determine whether something will have a function factory - where?

2019-07-17 Thread Holger Knublauch
Does this also happen after you do a refresh of the system registries (System menu in TBC)? And are we talking about TBC or EDG? Holger On 18/07/2019 06:13, Jack Hodges wrote: I continue to develop logic in spin functions and templates and sometimes I get a function factory and sometimes I do

[topbraid-users] All rules that determine whether something will have a function factory - where?

2019-07-17 Thread Jack Hodges
I continue to develop logic in spin functions and templates and sometimes I get a function factory and sometimes I don't. Is there document that says for a function or a template what rules must be satisfied to avoid the "X has no function factory" error? I am naming the files properly (e.g., f