Re: [topbraid-users] How can we deactivate rdfs:label constraint?

2024-03-24 Thread Hamid Abdirad
Thank you, Holger. I place the triple into the ontology and it is working as expected. The explanation of the technical background makes sense. We will avoid placing shape-related triples in the data graphs. Best, Hamid On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 2:33:48 AM UTC-8 Holger Knublauch

Re: [topbraid-users] How can we deactivate rdfs:label constraint?

2024-02-14 Thread Holger Knublauch
Hi Hamid, where did you place the sh:deactivated triple? It should go into an Ontology, not another asset collection such as Taxonomy. I have just tried it and the deactivation seems to work. You are right about the change to bypass the SPARQL engine for 7.8 but I checked the code that it will

Re: [topbraid-users] How can we deactivate rdfs:label constraint?

2024-02-13 Thread Hamid Abdirad
Hi Holger, I tried inserting the triple, but it did not deactivate the shape. Do you know any other workaround? BTW. I see this comment on that shape, not sure if it matters here: "As of TopBraid 7.8, the validation engine will bypass the SPARQL query and use a native, optimized query

Re: [topbraid-users] How can we deactivate rdfs:label constraint?

2024-02-10 Thread Holger Knublauch
I believe it should disappear when you add a triple teamworkconstraints:MissingLabelConstraint sh:deactivated true . HTH Holger > On 9 Feb 2024, at 8:44 pm, Hamid Abdirad wrote: > > Hello, > AFAIK, EDG requires a rdfs:label for named nodes and raises the following > violation when it is

[topbraid-users] How can we deactivate rdfs:label constraint?

2024-02-09 Thread Hamid Abdirad
Hello, AFAIK, EDG requires a rdfs:label for named nodes and raises the following violation when it is not available: Missing label Suggestion: Generate a label for My question: (1) Is it possible to deactivate this constraint for select collections? EDG Version: 7.8.0 It looks like this