[topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-12-21 Thread Jeff Schmitz
1) > >>> 2. "similar names" rule (interation 1) > >>> 3. eq-ref (iteration 2) > >>> 4. "similar names" rule (interation 2) > > >>> Continuing with these thoughts, it would be nice if there were a way that > >>> you

Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-12-21 Thread Holger Knublauch
) >> >>> Continuing with these thoughts, it would be nice if there were a way that >>> you could specify that all iterations of rules specified by one spin:rule >>> subproperty be executed before rules specified by a different spin:rule >>> subproperty

[topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-12-21 Thread Jeff Schmitz
nextRuleProperty won't help you since iteration 1 of the > > "similar names" rule will run before iteration 2 of prp-if, so in cases > > where two clients have the same SSN, and thus are for all intents and > > purposes the same client, you would still get a &quo

Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-12-20 Thread Holger Knublauch
et a "possibleMatch" property inferred. > > 1. prp-inf (iteration 1) > 2. prp-inf (iteration 2) > 3. "similar names" rule (interation 1) > 4. "similar names" rule (interation 2) > > > jeff > > > > >> -Original Mes

RE: [topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-12-20 Thread Schmitz, Jeffrey A
-inf (iteration 1) 2. prp-inf (iteration 2) 3. "similar names" rule (interation 1) 4. "similar names" rule (interation 2) jeff > -Original Message- > From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:topbraid- > us...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Scott Henni

RE: [topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-04-28 Thread Irene Polikoff
correct -Original Message- From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of actress Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:34 PM To: TopBraid Suite Users Subject: [topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules Hey all, in your http

[topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-04-28 Thread actress
Hey all, in your http://www.w3.org/Submission/spin-modeling/#spin-rules-order you're saying that "On the most granular level, it is possible to group rules into categories using sub-properties of spin:rule." Want to clarify -how this category would be defined? So we come to hierarchy of propertie

[topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-04-26 Thread Scott Henninger
Aziza; In the end the order of execution doesn't matter, except perhaps for performance reasons (then use the rule ordering properties described in http://spinrdf.org/spin.html#spin-rules-order). SPIN will execute the set of rules until no new triples are created. This means that if rule1 creates

Re: [topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-04-26 Thread Holger Knublauch
There are multiple options to control the ordering of rules, see http://spinrdf.org/spin.html#spin-rules-order Holger On Apr 26, 2011, at 3:54 PM, actress wrote: > If there is no ordering how SPIN fires the rules - this is my > concern. > We just want to clarify if there are a lot of r

[topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-04-25 Thread actress
If there is no ordering how SPIN fires the rules - this is my concern. We just want to clarify if there are a lot of rules ready to fire without any control execution how would SPIN decide which one to choose? Aziza On Apr 26, 12:48 pm, Scott Henninger wrote: > Hello Aziza; SPIN rules will execu

[topbraid-users] Re: Controlling the Execution Order of Rules

2011-04-25 Thread Scott Henninger
Hello Aziza; SPIN rules will execute all rules from the spin:rule and subproperties of spin:rule. There is no inherent ordering of these rules. What kind of ordering is you colleague expecting? -- Scott On Apr 25, 11:35 pm, aziza wrote: > Inhttp://spinrdf.org/spin.html#spin-rules-libraryyou're