gt; Sent: donderdag 1 februari 2024 20:57
> To: 'Branson, GaBriella C' via TopBraid Suite Users
> mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>>
> Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] versionIRI import question
>
> Hi Michel,
>
> As mentioned earlier, TopBraid does no
users@googlegroups.com On
Behalf Of Holger Knublauch
Sent: donderdag 1 februari 2024 20:57
To: 'Branson, GaBriella C' via TopBraid Suite Users
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] versionIRI import question
Hi Michel,
As mentioned earlier, TopBraid does not use or support owl:versionIRI
s.
>
> From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On
> Behalf Of Holger Knublauch
> Sent: woensdag 31 januari 2024 14:27
> To: 'Branson, GaBriella C' via TopBraid Suite Users
>
> Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] versionIRI import question
>
> I don't see where w
blauch
Sent: woensdag 31 januari 2024 14:27
To: 'Branson, GaBriella C' via TopBraid Suite Users
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] versionIRI import question
I don't see where we have special handling of owl:versionIRI, nor is it
required for anything.
What error do you get and with w
o: 'Branson, GaBriella C' via TopBraid Suite Users
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] versionIRI import question
I don't see where we have special handling of owl:versionIRI, nor is it
required for anything.
What error do you get and with what file?
Holger
On 31 Jan 2024, a
I don't see where we have special handling of owl:versionIRI, nor is it
required for anything.
What error do you get and with what file?
Holger
> On 31 Jan 2024, at 2:06 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
> wrote:
>
> Importing a versionIRI that is not defined as base-uri s
Importing a versionIRI that is not defined as base-uri seems to result in error.
Is it always needed to publish explicitly also versionIRI's?
(so, have the versionURI in ontology clause is not enough?)
Thx Michel
Dr. ir. H.M. Böhms (Michel)
Scientist Specialist
Mobility & Built Environment
T:
