damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic
transmission of messages.
Van: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Namens
David Price
Verzonden: donderdag 24 juni 2021 09:25
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] sh import?
On 24 Jun 2021, at
users@googlegroups.com>
> mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>>
> Namens Holger Knublauch
> Verzonden: donderdag 24 juni 2021 00:58
> Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] sh import?
>
&
s@googlegroups.com Namens
Holger Knublauch
Verzonden: donderdag 24 juni 2021 00:58
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] sh import?
On 2021-06-24 7:04 am, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote:
My view…sh would fit well in that list of la
*'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
*Verzonden:* woensdag 23 juni 2021 22:59
*Aan:* topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
*Onderwerp:* RE: [topbraid-users] sh import?
More like:
Is sh in the league of xsd/rdf/rdfs/owl (not imported)
Or in the league of others being imported explicitly
raid Suite Users
Verzonden: woensdag 23 juni 2021 22:59
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: RE: [topbraid-users] sh import?
More like:
Is sh in the league of xsd/rdf/rdfs/owl (not imported)
Or in the league of others being imported explicitly
Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms
Sci
: woensdag 23 juni 2021 22:03
Aan: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: [topbraid-users] sh import?
On 23/06/2021 8:37 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote:
Is it needed to explicitly import sh?
For what application?
In general, owl:imports are a good th
On 23/06/2021 8:37 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
wrote:
Is it needed to explicitly import sh?
For what application?
In general, owl:imports are a good thing. They make the semantics of the
used resources more explicit and transparent. If we skip them here,
where woul