Re: [topbraid-users] shacl for range only (in case of implicit targets)

2021-07-27 Thread Holger Knublauch
To establish a global range-like property constraint, you could do ex:hasUnitShape     a sh:NodeShape ;     sh:targetObjectsOf ex:hasUnit ;     sh:class qudt:Unit . Holger On 2021-07-27 9:17 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: I have in rdfs: x:hasUnit a rdf:Property

RE: [topbraid-users] shacl for range only (in case of implicit targets)

2021-07-28 Thread 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
Thx Holger So there is no implicit variant here without a target? Like: ex:hasUnit a sh:NodeShape ; sh:class qudt:Unit . (where ex:hasUnit is also an rdfs:Property somewhere else/imported). To establish a global range-like property constraint, you could do ex:hasUnitShape a sh:

Re: [topbraid-users] shacl for range only (in case of implicit targets)

2021-07-28 Thread Holger Knublauch
No. Holger On 28/07/2021 5:24 pm, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: Thx Holger So there is no implicit variant here without  a target? Like: ex:*hasUnit*     a sh:NodeShape ;     sh:class qudt:Unit . (where ex:hasUnit is also an rdfs:Property somewhere else/imported).