Re: [tor-dev] Sanitized bridge descriptor format 1.0

2012-05-22 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 5/21/12 7:19 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote: > On 5/21/12 5:55 PM, Damian Johnson wrote: >> I didn't realize that bridge extrainfo descriptors _were_ sanitized. >> What section of the format page details the scrubbing for those? > > Aha, good catch, that's not mentioned on the format page. Right no

[tor-dev] Fwd: Re: Can we stop sanitizing nicknames in bridge descriptors?

2012-05-22 Thread Karsten Loesing
Forwarding my original answer to Sebastian here. Original Message Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Can we stop sanitizing nicknames in bridge descriptors? Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:56:34 +0200 From: Karsten Loesing To: Sebastian G. Hi Sebastian, On 5/21/12 7:08 PM, Sebastian G. wrote

[tor-dev] GSoC Introduction - Pluggable Transports in Python

2012-05-22 Thread Brandon Wiley
Hello fellow Tor developers! Some information about me: *I worked for EFF/Tor Project last year for **GSoC 2011, my project **was a blocking-resistant transport evaluation framework: https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/blanu/blocking-test.git* I am also the author of a pluggable transport written

Re: [tor-dev] Fwd: Re: Can we stop sanitizing nicknames in bridge descriptors?

2012-05-22 Thread Sebastian G.
Karsten Loesing, 22.05.2012 09:24: > Forwarding my original answer to Sebastian here. To fix this, I have to reply again. > Hi Sebastian, > > On 5/21/12 7:08 PM, Sebastian G. wrote: > > (Did you intend to send this mail only to me, not to tor-dev? Feel free > to move the discussion back to to

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC Introduction - Pluggable Transports in Python

2012-05-22 Thread Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
On 5/22/12 5:34 PM, Brandon Wiley wrote: > *py2exe packaging for obfsproxy* > > The command line tool will be packaged into a standalone executable for > Windows. Would you be interested in leveraging knowledge/code/experience from APAF (Anonymous Python Application Framework): http://www.mail-a