[tor-dev] Tor Cloud is broken - please help debug?

2013-09-09 Thread Runa A. Sandvik
Hi everyone, It seems something is wrong with the Tor Cloud [1] instances [2]. My best guess is that the instances are failing to auto-update packages and are left in a state where tor is not running, new packages are not being installed, and the instances are not doing anything useful. I am not a

Re: [tor-dev] dynamic changes to ORPort set (via controller)

2013-09-09 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> Suppose I have a relay (not a client) which starts out with one open >> ORPort and a local controller. >> >> 1) Is there a better way (read "supported in STEM") than using SETCONF >> to

Re: [tor-dev] dynamic changes to ORPort set (via controller)

2013-09-09 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: > Suppose I have a relay (not a client) which starts out with one open > ORPort and a local controller. > > 1) Is there a better way (read "supported in STEM") than using SETCONF > to add ORPort lines, to direct this relay to open additional ORP

[tor-dev] dynamic changes to ORPort set (via controller)

2013-09-09 Thread Zack Weinberg
Suppose I have a relay (not a client) which starts out with one open ORPort and a local controller. 1) Is there a better way (read "supported in STEM") than using SETCONF to add ORPort lines, to direct this relay to open additional ORPorts? 2) Will adding or removing ORPorts at runtime affect est

Re: [tor-dev] Quickly testing TOR using Chutney and Fluxcapacitor

2013-09-09 Thread Marek Majkowski
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Marek Majkowski wrote: > > I was not aware of this script. I'll take a look. $ cat chutney/tools/bootstrap-network.sh [...] offset=$(expr \( $(date +%s) + $VOTING_OFFSET \) % 300) CONFOPT="TestingV3AuthVotingStartOffset" for file in net/nodes/*a/torrc; do sed

[tor-dev] [GSOC] Status report - Tor capabilities

2013-09-09 Thread Cristian-Matei Toader
Hello tor-dev, Not much has happened since the last status report. I have been fixing small issues [1] with the seccomp2 filter and have been working on the change requests from nickm's code review for merging stage 2 of tor sandboxing [2]. I am currently waiting for feedback, which is very likel

Re: [tor-dev] First draft of Requirements and Software Design for a Better Tor Performance Measurement Tool

2013-09-09 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 9/6/13 6:23 PM, Lunar wrote: > Karsten Loesing: >> Feedback in the form of patches to the LaTeX sources is most preferred, >> though email replies are of course fine, too. > > See attachments. Applied with two trivial tweaks. Thanks! Best, Karsten ___

Re: [tor-dev] First draft of Requirements and Software Design for a Better Tor Performance Measurement Tool

2013-09-09 Thread Karsten Loesing
On 9/6/13 6:52 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> An experiment making these more realistic measurements should use >> -something like Selenium/Firefox to control an actual browser to make >> +something like Selenium to control an actual Tor Browser to make >> requests. > > FYI, I have written code that

[tor-dev] [GSOC 2013] Steganography Browser Extension Status Report

2013-09-09 Thread Hareesan
Hi all, First of all, let me apologize for being late in sending this report. In last two weeks, I was mostly engaged with code updating and fine tuning the code. I spent time in changing the public key cryptography libraries [1] to support Firefox supported imports. And I'm not completed with this