The only difference between 2 and 3 clause BSD is
the presence of the third clause. So long as you're
not doing what the third clause restricts, they're
compatible. Coordination is still prudent though.
3 clause still exists because some people (mostly legacy entities)
think "endorsement" and "pro
Why you guys use JAVA for such a security concerned email client?
JAVA itself isn't secure and most relayable computers don't have
a virtual machine. You know JavaSnoop and vm-hookers like that?
Just rewrite it into plain C imho...
/jo
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. September 2013 um 02:26 Uhr
> Von
On 9/18/13 3:49 AM, Kevin Butler wrote:
>> Executing scripts and reading stdout/stderr is probably too low-level.
>> I think we need a Python/Twisted (or whatever language Torperf will be
>> written in) interface for running an experiment and retrieving results.
>
> You're probably right on stdout/
On 9/17/13 6:39 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 9/17/13 6:25 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:53:15AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>>> Here are the three graphs just for September, all ending on the
>>> same day:
>>>
>>> https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html?graph=dire
On 9/17/13 12:02 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> I think it would be good to write a paragraph or two to answer Matthew's
> question -- why are these new numbers different, and what makes us think
> they're better? I admit I've lost track of the various user counting
> approaches too.
I thought more
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 9/16/13 2:51 PM, Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran wrote:
>> I'm currently using BSD 3-Clause License (used by Tor) for torperf2.
>> Kevin ported ooni's setup script and made it work with torperf2, but
>> ooni uses a BSD 2-Clause License (both
Josef,
Spot on.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:23 AM, wrote:
> Why you guys use JAVA for such a security concerned email client?
>
> JAVA itself isn't secure and most relayable computers don't have
> a virtual machine. You know JavaSnoop and vm-hookers like that?
>
> Just rewrite it into plain C im
josef.win...@email.de ha scritto:
> Why you guys use JAVA for such a security concerned email client?
>
> JAVA itself isn't secure and most relayable computers don't have
> a virtual machine. You know JavaSnoop and vm-hookers like that?
>
> Just rewrite it into plain C imho...
>
> /jo
>
JavaSnoo
Hi Nick, Ian,
I've been pointing people to "Section 6 of
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.228.6223"; when
they ask what NTor is. But then I realized that that's not the best
(single) place to send cryptographers when I ask them to analyze whether
we've designed or built it r
