Re: [tor-dev] Torbirdy - IMAP issue

2013-12-05 Thread griffin
Amusingly, I've had this happen myself. Even though my default was set to encrypt outgoing messages, it still sent several unencrypted drafts to ioerror (of all people).[1] *However*, I was not using TorBirdy -- just the combination of Thunderbird and Enigmail. Now Thunderbird is set to *

Re: [tor-dev] Torbirdy - IMAP issue

2013-12-05 Thread Sukhbir Singh
Hi, > Using Thunderbird+Enigmail+Torbirdy. > To solve this the user need to manually set the account drafts > settings (in Copies & Folders) to keep drafts on Local Folders. > > I think Torbirdy should do it by default. > > This info should be added to known issues on Torbirdy wiki. (If I recall

Re: [tor-dev] Torbirdy - IMAP issue

2013-12-05 Thread Nima Fatemi
It doesn't have anything to do with TorBirdy. All you really have to do, is to have Encryption on by default in Enigmail. Your drafts are now going to be encrypted. Problem solved! Bests, -- Nima 0XC009DB191C92A77B | mrphs - https://anarchy.io "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to

[tor-dev] Torbirdy - IMAP issue

2013-12-05 Thread arkmd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Accessing an email server via IMAP may leak data by saving a draft on the remote server. Using Thunderbird+Enigmail+Torbirdy. While writing a message on Thunderbird, it is automatically saved as a draft, which by default is sent to the IMAP server

[tor-dev] Pluggable transports meeting tomorrow (Friday 6th of December 2013)

2013-12-05 Thread George Kadianakis
Greetings humans, this is an email to remind you that the regular biweekly pluggable transports meeting is going to happen tomorrow. Place is the #tor-dev IRC channel in OFTC. Time is 17:00 UTC. Cheers! ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.

Re: [tor-dev] (Draft) Proposal 224: Next-Generation Hidden Services in Tor

2013-12-05 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Kang wrote: > Hello. > I gave it a quick once over and these are my thoughts. > > I very much appreciate the ``Participants'' and ``In more detail: A > menagerie of keys'' sections. > I've had trouble in the past where I've been reading Tor specs and a > new (or inc

Re: [tor-dev] (Draft) Proposal 224: Next-Generation Hidden Services in Tor

2013-12-05 Thread Kang
Hello. I gave it a quick once over and these are my thoughts. I very much appreciate the ``Participants'' and ``In more detail: A menagerie of keys'' sections. I've had trouble in the past where I've been reading Tor specs and a new (or inconsistently named) key or actor is mentioned in passing. L