Re: [tor-dev] On the security of a commit-and-reveal solution for #8244

2013-12-12 Thread Nicholas Hopper
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:55 AM, George Kadianakis wrote: > (This message has been sitting in my drafts for a week or so, because > I fear that it might make no sense. Today I cleaned it up and decided > to post it.) > > Hello Nick and Elly, > > we were recently discussing various commit-and-revea

Re: [tor-dev] (Draft) Proposal 224: Next-Generation Hidden Services in Tor

2013-12-12 Thread Nicholas Hopper
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > Appendix A. Signature scheme with key blinding [KEYBLIND] > ... > See [KEYBLIND-REFS] for an extensive discussion on this scheme and > possible alternatives. I've transcribed this from a description by > Tanja Lange at the end of the

Re: [tor-dev] Slight obfsproxy API change (#10342)

2013-12-12 Thread Ximin Luo
On 12/12/13 23:40, George Kadianakis wrote: > David Stainton writes: > >> Excellent! I was thinking of making this change but lately I haven't had >> much time. >> Merging that patch specified in the 1st ticket comment? That looks good. >> >> I'd be happy to update the bananaphone transport to us

Re: [tor-dev] Slight obfsproxy API change (#10342)

2013-12-12 Thread George Kadianakis
David Stainton writes: > Excellent! I was thinking of making this change but lately I haven't had > much time. > Merging that patch specified in the 1st ticket comment? That looks good. > > I'd be happy to update the bananaphone transport to use the new api! > > Cheers, > > David > The change is

[tor-dev] Gitian Build Failure (pt branch only?)

2013-12-12 Thread Kevin P Dyer
Hi Mike/dcf1, Building the pt branch [1] of tor-browser-bundle on Ubuntu 13.04, 64-bit resulted in the following error: <<< ./bin/gbuild:21:in `system!': failed to run on-target setarch i386 bash -x < var/build-script > var/build.log 2>&1 (RuntimeError) from ./bin/gbuild:121:in `build_one_configu

Re: [tor-dev] InjectSOCKS: 2nd try

2013-12-12 Thread David Goulet
Hi again, Sorry for the delay to respond! On 10 Dec (20:27:14), t...@herr-der-mails.de wrote: > Hello David, > > thank you for your reaction. I've read some information about > "Torsocks" now and yes, it seems to be similar. Unfortunately the > information on Torsocks's homepage is rather shor

Re: [tor-dev] Tor project automation work

2013-12-12 Thread Georg Koppen
Nicolas Vigier: > In addition to this, an other thing that we could do automatically is > rebasing the tor-browser patches onto the unreleased next mozilla esr > from http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr24/ in the default branch. > This allows to see in advance if rebasing the patches on the

Re: [tor-dev] Tor project automation work

2013-12-12 Thread Nicolas Vigier
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Nicolas Vigier wrote: > > > In order to help me doing that, I'm very interested to receive from > > > developers of any tor components : > > > > > > - a description or ticket number of bugs that you wish could have been > > > detected earlier with automated tests > > > > h

Re: [tor-dev] Slight obfsproxy API change (#10342)

2013-12-12 Thread David Stainton
Excellent! I was thinking of making this change but lately I haven't had much time. Merging that patch specified in the 1st ticket comment? That looks good. I'd be happy to update the bananaphone transport to use the new api! Cheers, David On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:33 PM, George Kadianakis w