Re: [tor-dev] Guard node security: ways forward (An update from the dev meeting)

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Nicholas Hopper wrote: > Another thought: we also should investigate how various thresholds > affect the relationship between the cumulative guard weight total and > the total exit weight. Well, that turns out not to be a real issue: even if we set the guard thres

Re: [tor-dev] Tor Browser Weekly IRC meetings at 19:00 UTC Wednesdays

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 07:09:39PM -0800, David Fifield wrote: > > 1. What have you been working on last week that other TBB people should > > be aware of? > > I made bundles with tor-fw-helper and flash proxy. They worked for some > users, but there are questions about port forwardings potential

Re: [tor-dev] Tor Browser Weekly IRC meetings at 19:00 UTC Wednesdays

Preemptively because I won't be at the meeting, > 1. What have you been working on last week that other TBB people should > be aware of? I made bundles with tor-fw-helper and flash proxy. They worked for some users, but there are questions about port forwardings potentially lasting forever and a

Re: [tor-dev] Guard node security: ways forward (An update from the dev meeting)

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:10 PM, George Kadianakis wrote: > For example, I'm not sure if I'm using the correct bandwidth > values. I'm currently using the value in 'w' lines of the consensus > ('w Bandwidth=479'). I used to think that this is a unitless number, > but looking at dir-spec.t

Re: [tor-dev] [draft]: Proposal xxx: Pluggable transport SOCKS5 extensions

On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 22:30:06 +0100 "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" wrote: > Il 2/25/14, 11:15 AM, Yawning Angel ha scritto: > > Hello all, > > > > To address bug #10671: "Pluggable Transports: Improve method of > > transferring parameters to client-side transports", I submit the > > enclosed proposal

Re: [tor-dev] [draft]: Proposal xxx: Pluggable transport SOCKS5 extensions

Il 2/25/14, 11:15 AM, Yawning Angel ha scritto: > Hello all, > > To address bug #10671: "Pluggable Transports: Improve method of > transferring parameters to client-side transports", I submit the > enclosed proposal for consideration. Please consider integrating within SOCKS protocol related extens

[tor-dev] Tor Browser Weekly IRC meetings at 19:00 UTC Wednesdays

At the dev meting, we agreed to hold weekly TBB meetings in #tor-dev on IRC (irc.oftc.net), ideally either before or after the tor-core meetings. It looks like we're going to shoot for Wednesdays at 11:00am PST/19:00 UTC. If we can agree on this time, Nick has said that the tor-core meetings may be

Re: [tor-dev] [draft]: Proposal xxx: Pluggable transport SOCKS5 extensions

On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:42:51 + George Kadianakis wrote: > > Version: 8 bits (unsigned integer) > > > >This field specifies the version of the authentication > > method. It MUST be set to X'01'. > > > > How is the client-side version field supposed to be used? For example, > if t

Re: [tor-dev] [draft]: Proposal xxx: Pluggable transport SOCKS5 extensions

Yawning Angel writes: > Hello all, > > To address bug #10671: "Pluggable Transports: Improve method of > transferring parameters to client-side transports", I submit the > enclosed proposal for consideration. > Very nice! A few comments below. > --- Begin proposal body --- > > Filename: xxx-pt

[tor-dev] Proposal 220 (revised): Migrate server identity keys to Ed25519

I've revised proposal 220 based on commentary from Roger. The biggest changes is tweaking all of the things called "certificates" to make them actually follow the same format to greatest the extent possible. To see diffs, you can use git, or browse the gitweb site at https://gitweb.torproject.org

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC Ideas

I am sorry. Where you mentioned "clear web" I mistook hidden services to be the Deep Web[1]. That's what I meant by Dark Web. [1] : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Web On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:41 PM, George Kadianakis wrote: > Vighnesh Birodkar writes: > > > Hello > > > > I am found a cou

[tor-dev] Proposal 228: Cross-certifying identity keys with onion keys

Here's a proposal that's been kicking around on my laptop for a while. I cleaned it up to use the revised certificate format from the revised proposal 220. My math and crypto claims might be incorrect here; I'm sure hoping somebody will tell me if they are. Filename: 228-cross-certification-oni

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC Ideas

Vighnesh Birodkar writes: > Hello > > I am found a couple of ideas from the Ideas Page interesting . I was a GSoC > student for SimpleCV last year. In the past I've programmed in C,C++,Java > and Python . > > Following are my queries . > > 1. Search for Hidden Services . > > I apologize in advanc

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC Ideas

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:57:11PM +0530, Vighnesh Birodkar wrote: > 2. Develop a Censorship Analyzer > > Will this be a part of any existing tor projects ? What is a student required > to do to be considered suitable for this ? It is not yet clear if this project will be part of GSoC. Required

[tor-dev] [draft]: Proposal xxx: Pluggable transport SOCKS5 extensions

Hello all, To address bug #10671: "Pluggable Transports: Improve method of transferring parameters to client-side transports", I submit the enclosed proposal for consideration. --- Begin proposal body --- Filename: xxx-pt-socks5-extensions.txt Title: Pluggable transport SOCKS5 extensions Author:

[tor-dev] IRC meeting on Wed, Feb 26, 18:00 UTC to discuss next steps for Weather rewrite

Hi everyone, we're going to have an IRC meeting to discuss next steps for the Weather rewrite: Wednesday, February 26, at 18:00 UTC in #tor-dev on OFTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20140226T18 Topics include reporting progress made since the last meeting two we

[tor-dev] GSoC Ideas

Hello I am found a couple of ideas from the Ideas Page interesting . I was a GSoC student for SimpleCV last year. In the past I've programmed in C,C++,Java and Python . Following are my queries . 1. Search for Hidden Services . I apologize in advance if there is something obviously wrong with m

Re: [tor-dev] Guard node security: ways forward (An update from the dev meeting)

Hi, I'm trying to follow this, so perhaps if someone could explain a little bit to me metrics reports. valid-after 2014-02-25 00:00:00 r phillw tNrlqRlQkVqUXVGLWFYhQeYBYI0 pR9ddClTA2Eo6AI989NA3BGXNs4