On 02/17/2015 04:13 PM, grarpamp wrote:
FreeBSD linux kernel module does not yet support 64bit.
For reference, 32bit:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/compat/linux/
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/i386/linux/
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/amd64/linux32/
OpenBSD's
Has anyone looked into this? I talked to the maintainer of the OpenBSD
Firefox port, but he wasn't very interested and pointed out the
difficulty caused by the deterministic build system.
I can verify that it doesn't work out of the box, but haven't had time
to play with it much more than that. I
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 02:22:54 +0400
meejah mee...@meejah.ca wrote:
From my perspective, the entire point of this feature is to allow
applications to use the system Tor (or, at least some
already-running tor) to put their hidden services on.
The design the way it is with more isolation than
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015, at 04:45 PM, Yawning Angel wrote:
Yes, this means that if you run kittensomgmewmew.onion and are scared
of the NSA's persistent attempts to extract your hidden service key,
via ultrasonic laser beamed from their satellites,
...or the backdoor in the firmware on your hard
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Libertas liber...@mykolab.com wrote:
Has anyone looked into this? I talked to the maintainer of the OpenBSD
Firefox port, but he wasn't very interested and pointed out the
difficulty caused by the deterministic build system.
I can verify that it doesn't work
Let me chime in on saying that this looks to me like a great
development. I even imagine that in a couple of years most
end-to-end encrypted services on the Internet may be using
this interface, so for the sake of accessibility for future
devs, I would suggest something totally superficial:
On
