Re: [tor-dev] Porting Tor Browser to the BSDs

2015-02-17 Thread Libertas
On 02/17/2015 04:13 PM, grarpamp wrote: > FreeBSD linux kernel module does not yet support 64bit. > For reference, 32bit: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/compat/linux/ > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/i386/linux/ > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/amd64/linux32/ OpenBS

Re: [tor-dev] Porting Tor Browser to the BSDs

2015-02-17 Thread grarpamp
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Libertas wrote: > Has anyone looked into this? I talked to the maintainer of the OpenBSD > Firefox port, but he wasn't very interested and pointed out the > difficulty caused by the deterministic build system. > > I can verify that it doesn't work out of the box,

Re: [tor-dev] RFC: Ephemeral Hidden Services via the Control Port

2015-02-17 Thread Dave Huseby
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015, at 04:45 PM, Yawning Angel wrote: > Yes, this means that if you run "kittensomgmewmew.onion" and are scared > of the NSA's persistent attempts to extract your hidden service key, > via ultrasonic laser beamed from their satellites, ...or the backdoor in the firmware on your

[tor-dev] Porting Tor Browser to the BSDs

2015-02-17 Thread Libertas
Has anyone looked into this? I talked to the maintainer of the OpenBSD Firefox port, but he wasn't very interested and pointed out the difficulty caused by the deterministic build system. I can verify that it doesn't work out of the box, but haven't had time to play with it much more than that. I

[tor-dev] Release: obfs4proxy-0.0.4

2015-02-17 Thread Yawning Angel
Hello all, I just tagged obfs4proxy-0.0.4, though the changes do not affect most people directly, I figured it's worth an announcement. Changes in version 0.0.4 - 2015-02-17 - Improve the runtime performance of the obfs4 handshake tests. - Changed the go.crypto import path to the new location (

Re: [tor-dev] RFC: Ephemeral Hidden Services via the Control Port

2015-02-17 Thread carlo von lynX
Let me chime in on saying that this looks to me like a great development. I even imagine that in a couple of years most end-to-end encrypted services on the Internet may be using this interface, so for the sake of accessibility for future devs, I would suggest something totally superficial: On Sa

Re: [tor-dev] RFC: Ephemeral Hidden Services via the Control Port

2015-02-17 Thread Yawning Angel
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 02:22:54 +0400 meejah wrote: > From my perspective, the entire point of this feature is to allow > applications to use "the system Tor" (or, at least "some > already-running tor") to put their hidden services on. The design the way it is with more isolation than usual also al