Re: [tor-dev] RFC: Ephemeral Hidden Services via the Control Port

2015-02-25 Thread carlo von lynX
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 07:41:01AM +0100, Andreas Krey wrote: The AF_TOR listener would go away with closing the listener socket as well (and thus is bound to the lifetime of the process); so binding a hidden service to the control connection is the obvious analogy. Yes, but as it stands

[tor-dev] Priorities for Onionoo development

2015-02-25 Thread Karsten Loesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi iwakeh, cc'ed Tor devs, now that we're down to 0 defect tickets in the Onionoo component (not counting that one ticket in needs_review that I hope to resolve before the weekend), ... time for a little applause... I went through the 20 open

Re: [tor-dev] RFC: Ephemeral Hidden Services via the Control Port

2015-02-25 Thread Yawning Angel
Hello, Not sure about the renaming thing. I'm open to doing so, but a lot of the user facing stuff (the torrc configuration variables etc) use the HS terminology, so I'm not sure if being inconsistent is good. On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:51:59 +0100 carlo von lynX l...@time.to.get.psyced.org wrote:

[tor-dev] Hello, I am a Tor user in China.

2015-02-25 Thread Li Xiaodong
Hello, I am a Tor user in China. When will StegoTorus be deployed on Tor software? Thank you very much. ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev