On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for breaking out all the options, Isabela and Nick!
>
> After more consideration of all of them, given that these next few
> months will be spent mostly doing rebase work, I think either Option 2
> or Option 4 above seem like the b
Nick Mathewson:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Isabela wrote:
> > This is a great discussion, thanks Mike for writing down TBB release
> > process.
> >
> > I think is very important to start being more strategical on how we plan the
> > different projects releases. Of course this doesn't mean
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
> 1. It needs to be short. This is a terminal command so anything
> lengthy is just begging people to alias it down.
Short commands are more likely to cause collisions and sometimes
distribution maintainers are forced to rename them (leadin
