On 7/23/15, David Stainton dstainton...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are we avoiding allowing users to make this choice because of the
above reasons? If a user wants to run a relay or a bridge, we should
make it easy. We don't answer the above questions when it is hard -
are we really off the hook
On 7/24/15, Yawning Angel yawn...@schwanenlied.me wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:46:26 +
Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote:
[snip]
Do users know that their router's implementation of NAT-PMP/uPnP is
shit?
Who knows better than the user? And who better than the user to take
an
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:21:31 +
Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote:
[snip]
At this point with all the resources available, I will guess that if
the user needs something like tor-fw-helper, they probably have no
idea what router firmware is.
Right - but why should they need to
On 7/24/15, Yawning Angel yawn...@schwanenlied.me wrote:
...
I have less objections towards people using tor-fw-helper for bridges
than for something like flashproxy or full fledged relays.
...
IMO similar to relays with insufficient bandwidth, relays that can't
connect to any other relay on
